Open Unaimend opened 3 months ago
please remove the fix for #86 in this PR, as ignoring the problem is not fixing it.
please remove the fix for #86 in this PR, as ignoring the problem is not fixing i
please remove the fix for #86 in this PR, as ignoring the problem is not fixing it.
This PR is not executable without this "fix"
please remove the fix for #86 in this PR, as ignoring the problem is not fixing i
please remove the fix for #86 in this PR, as ignoring the problem is not fixing it.
This PR is not executable without this "fix"
Does it spit a warning at least? We should keep the issue open in any case.
please remove the fix for #86 in this PR, as ignoring the problem is not fixing i
please remove the fix for #86 in this PR, as ignoring the problem is not fixing it.
This PR is not executable without this "fix"
Does it spit a warning at least? We should keep the issue open in any case.
As discussed, it does
need fixing of #132 otherwise this will fail
Test case thats failing
Output of the matching.
You can see that keep1ToMany is false but the output contains one to many matches. I think they have been matched on inchi so the matchInchi function does not properly respect the parameter
Fixes #86 and #81.
We just iterate over all databases until no change in annotated inchis/dbs/names is detected