PowerLoom / snapshotter-core

Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Table of Contents

Overview

Snapshotter workflow

A snapshotter peer as part of Powerloom Protocol does exactly what the name suggests: It synchronizes with other snapshotter peers over a smart contract running on Powerloom Prost chain. It follows an architecture that is driven by state transitions which makes it easy to understand and modify.

Because of its decentralized nature, the snapshotter specification and its implementations share some powerful features that can adapt to your specific information requirements on blockchain applications:

Architecture

The Snapshotter Peer is thoughtfully designed with a modular and highly configurable architecture, allowing for easy customization and seamless integration. It consists of three core components:

  1. Main Snapshotter Codebase:

    • This foundational component defines all the essential interfaces and handles a wide range of tasks, from listening to epoch release events to distributing tasks and managing snapshot submissions.
  2. Configuration Files:

    • Configuration files, located in the /config directory are linked to snapshotter-configs repo, play a pivotal role in defining project types, specifying paths for individual compute modules, and managing various project-related settings.
  3. Compute Modules:

    • The heart of the system resides in the snapshotter/modules directory are linked to snapshotter-computes, where the actual computation logic for each project type is defined. These modules drive the snapshot generation process for specific project types.

Snapshotter Architecture

The architecture has been designed to facilitate the seamless interchange of configuration and modules. To achieve this, we maintain these components in separate Git repositories, which are then integrated into the Snapshotter Peer using Git Submodules. As a result, adapting the system to different use cases is as straightforward as changing a Git branch, offering unparalleled flexibility and versatility.

For more information on using Git Submodules, please refer to the Git Submodules Documentation.

Setup

The snapshotter is a distributed system with multiple moving parts. The easiest way to get started is by using the Docker-based setup according to the instructions in the section: Development setup and instructions.

If you're planning to participate as a snapshotter, refer to these instructions to start snapshotting.

If you're a developer, you can follow the manual configuration steps for pooler from this document followed by the instructions on the deploy repo for code contributors for a more hands-on approach.

Note - RPC usage is highly use-case specific. If your use case is complicated and needs to make a lot of RPC calls, it is recommended to run your own RPC node instead of using third-party RPC services as it can be expensive.

Increase IPFS memory limits (for complex use cases)

If you want to increase the memory limits for IPFS, you can do so by running the following commands, this will reset on system restart though:

sudo sysctl -w net.core.rmem_max=8388608
sudo sysctl -w net.core.wmem_max=8388608
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.udp_mem='8388608 8388608 8388608'
sudo sysctl -w net.core.netdev_max_backlog=5000
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_rmem='4096 87380 8388608'
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_wmem='4096 87380 8388608'

To make these changes permanent, add or modify the following lines in /etc/sysctl.conf:

net.core.rmem_max=8388608
net.core.wmem_max=8388608
net.ipv4.udp_mem=8388608 8388608 8388608
net.core.netdev_max_backlog=5000
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem=4096 87380 8388608
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem=4096 87380 8388608

Apply the changes with:

sudo sysctl -p

Restart the docker service

sudo systemctl restart docker

Finally, bring up your Docker Compose stack again:

./clean_stop.sh
./build.sh

State transitions and data composition

Data composition

Epoch Generation

An epoch denotes a range of block heights on the EVM-compatible data source blockchain, for eg Ethereum mainnet/Polygon PoS mainnet/testnet. This makes it easier to collect state transitions and snapshots of data on equally spaced block height intervals, as well as to support future work on other lightweight anchor proof mechanisms like Merkle proofs, succinct proofs, etc.

The size of an epoch is configurable. Let that be referred to as size(E)

Preloaders perform an important function of fetching low-level data for eg. block details, and transaction receipts so that subsequent base snapshot building can proceed without performing unnecessary redundant calls that ultimately save on access costs on RPC and other queries on the underlying node infrastructure for the source data blockchain.

Each project type within the project configuration as found in config/projects.json can specify the preloaders that their base snapshot builds depend on. Once the dependent preloaders have completed their fetches, the Processor Distributor subsequently triggers the base snapshot builders for each project type.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/5e7cc3812074d91e8d7d85058554bb1175bf8070/config/projects.example.json#L2-L8

The preloaders implement one of the following two generic interfaces

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/5e7cc3812074d91e8d7d85058554bb1175bf8070/snapshotter/utils/callback_helpers.py#L109-L126

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/5e7cc3812074d91e8d7d85058554bb1175bf8070/snapshotter/utils/callback_helpers.py#L129-L161

The preloaders can be found in the snapshotter/utils/preloaders directory. The preloaders that are available to project configuration entries are exposed through the config/preloader.json configuration.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/5e7cc3812074d91e8d7d85058554bb1175bf8070/config/preloader.json#L1-L27

At the moment, we have 3 generic preloaders built into the snapshotter template.

More preloaders can be easily added depending on the use case user is snapshotting for. It is as simple as writing logic in preloader.py, adding the preloader config to config/preloader.json, and adding the preloader dependency in config/projects.json

Base Snapshot Generation

Workers, as mentioned in the configuration section for config/projects.json, calculate base snapshots against this epochId which corresponds to collections of state observations and event logs between the blocks at height in the range [begin, end].

The data sources are determined according to the following specification for the projects key:

The project ID is ultimately generated in the following manner:

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/utils/snapshot_worker.py#L51-L71

The snapshots generated by workers defined in this config are the fundamental data models on which higher-order aggregates and richer data points are built. The SnapshotSubmitted event generated on such base snapshots further triggers the building of sophisticated aggregates, super-aggregates, filters, and other data composites on top of them.

Bulk Mode

For situations where data sources are constantly changing or numerous, making it impractical to maintain an extensive list of them, the Snapshotter Peer offers a Bulk Mode. This feature is particularly useful in scenarios where specific data sources need not be defined explicitly.

In Bulk Mode, the system monitors all transactions and blocks without the need for predefined data sources. The Processor Distributor generates a SnapshotProcessMessage with bulk mode enabled for each project type. When snapshot workers receive this message, they leverage preloaded transaction receipts for entire blocks, filtering out relevant transactions to generate snapshots for all data sources that interacted with the blockchain during that epoch. Snapshot worker then generates relevant project Ids for these snapshots and submits them for further processing.

Bulk Mode is highly effective in situations where the project list is continually expanding or where snapshots don't need to be submitted in every epoch, perhaps because the data hasn't changed significantly. Example use cases include monitoring on-chain activities and tracking task or quest completion statuses on the blockchain.

An important advantage of Bulk Mode is that, since all transaction receipts are preloaded, this approach can efficiently scale to accommodate a large number of project types with little to no increase in RPC (Remote Procedure Call) calls.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/utils/snapshot_worker.py#L260-L299

Data source signaling

As seen above in the section on base snapshot generation, data sources can be dynamically added to the contract according to the role of certain peers in the ecosystem known as 'signallers'. This is the most significant aspect of the Powerloom Protocol ecosystem apart from snapshotting and will soon be decentralized to factor in on-chain activity, and market forces and accommodate a demand-driven, dynamic data ecosystem.

In the existing setup, when the project_type is set to an empty array ([]) and bulk mode is not activated, the snapshotter node attempts to retrieve data sources corresponding to the projects key from the protocol state contract.

Whenever a data source is added or removed by a combination of the data source-detector and signaller, the protocol state smart contract emits a ProjectUpdated event, adhering to the defined data model.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/5892eeb9433d8f4b8aa677006d98a1dde0458cb7/snapshotter/utils/models/data_models.py#L102-L105

The snapshotting for every such dynamically added project is initiated only when the epochId, corresponding to the field enableEpochId contained within the ProjectUpdated event, is released. The processor distributor correctly triggers the snapshotting workflow for such dynamically added data sources in the following segment:

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/processor_distributor.py#L765-L796

Snapshot Finalization

All snapshots per project reach consensus on the protocol state contract which results in a SnapshotFinalized event being triggered.

event SnapshotFinalized(uint256 indexed epochId, uint256 epochEnd, string projectId, string snapshotCid, uint256 timestamp);

Epoch processing state transitions

The following is a sequence of states that an epoch goes through from the point epoch is released until SnapshotFinalized event is received by the processor distributor for the specific epoch. These state transitions can be inspected in detail as noted in the section on internal snapshotter APIs.


EPOCH_RELEASED

The state name is self explanatory.

PRELOAD

For every project type's preloader specifications, the status of all the preloading dependencies being satisfied is captured here:

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/bcc245d228acce504ba803b9b50fd89c8eb05984/snapshotter/processor_distributor.py#L227-L251

SNAPSHOT_BUILD

The snapshot builders as configured in projects.json are executed. Also refer to the case study of the current implementation of Pooler for a detailed look at snapshot building for base as well as aggregates.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/bcc245d228acce504ba803b9b50fd89c8eb05984/snapshotter/utils/snapshot_worker.py#L100-L120

SNAPSHOT_SUBMIT_PAYLOAD_COMMIT

Captures the status of propagation of the built snapshot to the payload commit service in Audit Protocol for further submission to the protocol state contract.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/bcc245d228acce504ba803b9b50fd89c8eb05984/snapshotter/utils/generic_worker.py#L166-L195

RELAYER_SEND

Payload commit service has sent the snapshot to a transaction relayer to submit to the protocol state contract.

SNAPSHOT_FINALIZE

Finalized snapshot accepted against an epoch via a SnapshotFinalized event.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/bcc245d228acce504ba803b9b50fd89c8eb05984/snapshotter/processor_distributor.py#L475-L482

Aggregation and data composition - snapshot generation of higher-order data points on base snapshots

Workers as defined in config/aggregator.json are triggered by the appropriate signals forwarded to Processor Distributor corresponding to the project ID filters as explained in the Configuration section. This is best seen in action in Pooler, the snapshotter implementation that serves multiple aggregated data points for Uniswap v2 trade information.

In case of aggregation over multiple projects, their project IDs are generated with a combination of the hash of the dependee project IDs along with the namespace

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/utils/aggregation_worker.py#L59-L112

Major Components

Snapshotter Components

System Event Detector

The system event detector tracks events being triggered on the protocol state contract running on the anchor chain and forwards it to a callback queue with the appropriate routing key depending on the event signature and type among other information.

Related information and other services depending on these can be found in previous sections: State Transitions, Configuration.

Process Hub Core

The Process Hub Core, defined in process_hub_core.py, serves as the primary process manager in the snapshotter.

Processor Distributor

The Processor Distributor, defined in processor_distributor.py, is initiated using the processhub_cmd.py CLI.

Delegation Workers for preloaders

The preloaders often fetch and cache large volumes of data, for eg, all the transaction receipts for a block on the data source blockchain. In such a case, a single worker will never be enough to feasibly fetch the data for a timely base snapshot generation and subsequent aggregate snapshot generations to finally reach a consensus.

Hence such workers are defined as delegate_tasks in config/preloader.json and the process hub core launches a certain number of workers as defined in the primary settings file, config/settings.json under the key callback_worker_config.num_delegate_workers.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/5e7cc3812074d91e8d7d85058554bb1175bf8070/config/preloader.json#L19-L25

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/5e7cc3812074d91e8d7d85058554bb1175bf8070/config/settings.example.json#L86-L90

Delegation workers operate over a simple request-response queue architecture over RabbitMQ.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/init_rabbitmq.py#L90-L111

One of the preloaders bundled with this snapshotter peer is tasked with fetching all the transaction receipts within a given epoch's block range and because of the volume of data to be fetched it delegates this work to a bunch of delegation worker

As a common functionality shared by all preloaders that utilize delegate workers, this logic is present in the generic class DelegatorPreloaderAsyncWorker that all such preloaders inherit. Here you can observe the workload is sent to the delegation workers

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/utils/generic_delegator_preloader.py#L188-L227

Upon sending out the workloads tagged by unique request IDs, the delegator sets up a temporary exclusive queue to which only the delegation workers meant for the task type push their responses.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/utils/generic_delegator_preloader.py#L158-L186

The corresponding response being pushed by the delegation workers can be found here in the generic class DelegateAsyncWorker that all such workers should inherit from:

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/utils/delegate_worker.py#L74-L84

Delegation worker dependent preloading architecture

Callback Workers

The callback workers are the ones that build the base snapshot and aggregation snapshots and as explained above, are launched by the process hub core according to the configurations in aggregator/projects.json and config/aggregator.json.

They listen to new messages on the RabbitMQ topic exchange as described in the following configuration, and the topic queue's initialization is as follows.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/5e7cc3812074d91e8d7d85058554bb1175bf8070/config/settings.example.json#L42-L44

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/init_rabbitmq.py#L182-L213

Upon receiving a message from the processor distributor after preloading is complete, the workers do most of the heavy lifting along with some sanity checks and then call the compute() callback function on the project's configured snapshot worker class to transform the dependent data points as cached by the preloaders to finally generate the base snapshots.

RPC Helper

Extracting data from the blockchain state and generating the snapshot can be a complex task. The RpcHelper, defined in utils/rpc.py, has a bunch of helper functions to make this process easier. It handles all the retry and caching logic so that developers can focus on efficiently building their use cases.

Core API

This component is one of the most important and allows you to access the finalized protocol state on the smart contract running on the anchor chain. Find it in core_api.py.

The pooler-frontend that serves the Uniswap v2 dashboards hosted by the PowerLoom foundation on locations like https://uniswapv2.powerloom.io/ is a great example of a frontend specific web application that makes use of this API service.

Among many things, the core API allows you to access the finalized CID as well as its contents at a given epoch ID for a project.

The main endpoint implementations can be found as follows:

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/core_api.py#L248-L339

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/core_api.py#L343-L404

The first endpoint in GET /last_finalized_epoch/{project_id} returns the last finalized EpochId for a given project ID and the second one is GET /data/{epoch_id}/{project_id}/ which can be used to return the actual snapshot data for a given EpochId and ProjectId.

These endpoints along with the combination of a bunch of other helper endpoints present in Core API can be used to build powerful Dapps and dashboards.

You can observe the way it is used in pooler-frontend repo to fetch the dataset for the aggregate projects of top pairs trade volume and token reserves summary:

try {
      response = await axios.get(API_PREFIX+`/data/${epochInfo.epochId}/${top_pairs_7d_project_id}/`);
      console.log('got 7d top pairs', response.data);
      if (response.data) {
        for (let pair of response.data.pairs) {
          pairsData7d[pair.name] = pair;
        }
      } else {
        throw new Error(JSON.stringify(response.data));
      }
    }
    catch (e){
      console.error('7d top pairs', e);
    }

Development setup and instructions

These instructions are needed to run the system using build-docker.sh.

Configuration

Pooler needs the following config files to be present

Monitoring and Debugging

Login to the pooler docker container using docker exec -it deploy-boost-1 bash (use docker ps to verify its presence in the list of running containers) and use the following commands for monitoring and debugging

Internal Snapshotter APIs

All implementations of a snapshotter come equipped with a barebones API service that return detailed insights into its state. You can tunnel into port 8002 of an instance running the snapshotter and right away try out the internal APIs among others by visting the FastAPI generated SwaggerUI.

http://localhost:8002/docs

Snapshotter API SwaggerUI

GET /internal/snapshotter/epochProcessingStatus

As detailed out in the section on epoch processing state transitions, this internal API endpoint offers the most detailed insight into each epoch's processing status as it passes through the snapshot builders and is sent out for consensus.

NOTE: The endpoint, though paginated and cached, serves a raw dump of insights into an epoch's state transitions and the payloads are significantly large enough for requests to timeout or to clog the internal API's limited resource. Hence it is advisable to query somewhere between 1 to 5 epochs. The same can be specified as the size query parameter.

Sample Request:

curl -X 'GET' \
  'http://localhost:8002/internal/snapshotter/epochProcessingStatus?page=1&size=3' \
  -H 'accept: application/json'

Sample Response:

{
    "items": [
      {
        "epochId": 43523,
        "transitionStatus": {
          "EPOCH_RELEASED": {
            "status": "success",
            "error": null,
            "extra": null,
            "timestamp": 1692530595
          },
          "PRELOAD": {
            "pairContract_pair_total_reserves": {
              "status": "success",
              "error": null,
              "extra": null,
              "timestamp": 1692530595
            },
          },
          "SNAPSHOT_BUILD": {
            "aggregate_24h_stats_lite:35ee1886fa4665255a0d0486c6079c4719c82f0f62ef9e96a98f26fde2e8a106:UNISWAPV2": {
              "status": "success",
              "error": null,
              "extra": null,
              "timestamp": 1692530596
            },
          },
          "SNAPSHOT_SUBMIT_PAYLOAD_COMMIT": {

          },
         "RELAYER_SEND": {

         },
        "SNAPSHOT_FINALIZE": {

        },
      },
    }
   ],
   "total": 3,
   "page": 1,
   "size": 3,
   "pages": 1
}

/status Returns the overall status of all the projects

Response

{
  "totalSuccessfulSubmissions": 10,
  "totalMissedSubmissions": 5,
  "totalIncorrectSubmissions": 1,
  "projects":[
    {
      "projectId": "projectid"
      "successfulSubmissions": 3,
      "missedSubmissions": 2,
      "incorrectSubmissions": 1
    },
  ]
}

GET /internal/snapshotter/status

Returns the overall status of all the projects

Response

{
  "totalSuccessfulSubmissions": 10,
  "totalMissedSubmissions": 5,
  "totalIncorrectSubmissions": 1,
  "projects":[
    {
      "projectId": "projectid"
      "successfulSubmissions": 3,
      "missedSubmissions": 2,
      "incorrectSubmissions": 1
    },
  ]
}

GET /internal/snapshotter/status/{project_id}

Returns project specific detailed status report

Response

{
  "missedSubmissions": [
    {
      "epochId": 10,
      "finalizedSnapshotCid": "cid",
      "reason": "error/exception/trace"
    }
  ],
  "incorrectSubmissions": [
    {
      "epochId": 12,
      "submittedSnapshotCid": "snapshotcid",
      "finalizedSnapshotCid": "finalizedsnapshotcid",
      "reason": "reason for incorrect submission"
    }
  ]
}

GET /internal/snapshotter/status/{project_id}?data=true

Returns project specific detailed status report with snapshot data

Response

{
  "missedSubmissions": [
    {
      "epochId": 10,
      "finalizedSnapshotCid": "cid",
      "reason": "error/exception/trace"
    }
  ],
  "incorrectSubmissions": [
    {
      "epochId": 12,
      "submittedSnapshotCid": "snapshotcid",
      "submittedSnapshot": {}
      "finalizedSnapshotCid": "finalizedsnapshotcid",
      "finalizedSnapshot": {},
      "reason": "reason for incorrect submission"
    }
  ]
}

For Contributors

We use pre-commit hooks to ensure our code quality is maintained over time. For this contributors need to do a one-time setup by running the following commands.

Now, whenever you commit anything, it'll automatically check the files you've changed/edited for code quality issues and suggest improvements.

Case Studies

1. Pooler: Case study and extending this implementation

Pooler is a Uniswap specific implementation of what is known as a 'snapshotter' in the PowerLoom Protocol ecosystem. It synchronizes with other snapshotter peers over a smart contract running on the present version of the PowerLoom Protocol testnet. It follows an architecture that is driven by state transitions which makes it easy to understand and modify. This present release ultimately provide access to rich aggregates that can power a Uniswap v2 dashboard with the following data points:

Extending pooler with a Uniswap v2 data point

In this section, let us take a look at the data composition abilities of Pooler to build on the base snapshot being built that captures information on Uniswap trades.

Step 1. Review: Base snapshot extraction logic for trade information

Required reading:

As you can notice in config/projects.example.json, each project config needs to have the following components

There's currently no limitation on the number or type of usecases you can build using snapshotter. Just write the Processor class and pooler libraries will take care of the rest.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/1452c166bef7534568a61b3a2ab0ff94535d7229/config/projects.example.json#L1-L35

If we take a look at the TradeVolumeProcessor class present at snapshotter/modules/computes/trade_volume.py it implements the interface of GenericProcessorSnapshot defined in pooler/utils/callback_helpers.py.

There are a couple of important concepts here necessary to write your extraction logic:

Output format can be anything depending on the usecase requirements. Although it is recommended to use proper pydantic models to define the snapshot interface.

The resultant output model in this specific example is UniswapTradesSnapshot as defined in the Uniswap v2 specific modules directory: utils/models/message_models.py. This encapsulates state information captured by TradeVolumeProcessor between the block heights of the epoch: min_chain_height and max_chain_height.

Step 2. Review: 24 hour aggregate of trade volume snapshots over a single pair contract

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/utils/data_utils.py#L273-L295

time_in_seconds = 86400
tail_epoch_id = current_epoch_id - int(time_in_seconds / (source_chain_epoch_size * source_chain_block_time))

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/utils/data_utils.py#L507-L547

    {
      "project_type": "aggregate_pairContract_24h_trade_volume",
      "aggregate_on": "SingleProject",
      "filters": {
        "projectId": "pairContract_trade_volume"
      },
      "processor": {
        "module": "computes.aggregate.single_uniswap_trade_volume_24h",
        "class_name": "AggregateTradeVolumeProcessor"
      }
    }
Step 3. New Datapoint: 2 hours aggregate of only swap events

From the information provided above, the following is left as an exercise for the reader to generate aggregate datasets at every epochId finalization for a pair contract, spanning 2 hours worth of snapshots and containing only Swap event logs and the trade volume generated from them as a result.

Feel free to fork this repo and commit these on your implementation branch. By following the steps recommended for developers for the overall setup on deploy, you can begin capturing aggregates for this datapoint.

2. Zkevm Quests: A Case Study of Implementation

Phase 2 quests form a crucial part of the Powerloom testnet program, where we leverage Snapshotter Peers to monitor on-chain activities of testnet participants across various chains and protocols. These quests predominantly operate in Bulk Mode due to their one-time nature and the highly dynamic set of participants involved.

In this particular implementation of the peer, known as 'Snapshotter' in the Powerloom Protocol, we have successfully harnessed its capabilities to provide accurate metrics, verified through consensus, pertaining to fundamental data points. These metrics allow us to determine if and when a quest is completed by a testnet participant.

This case study serves as a testament to the effectiveness and versatility of the Snapshotter Peer in real-world scenarios, highlighting its ability to support complex use cases with precision and reliability.

Review: Base snapshots

The snapshot builders can be found under the snapshotter-specific implementation directory: snapshotter/modules/computes. Every snapshot builder must implement the interface of GenericProcessorSnapshot

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/utils/callback_helpers.py#L179-L197

compute() should return an instance of a Pydantic model which is in turn uploaded to IPFS by the payload commit service helper method.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/pooler/blob/d8b7be32ad329e8dcf0a7e5c1b27862894bc990a/snapshotter/utils/generic_worker.py#L179-L191

Looking at the pre-supplied example configuration of config/projects.json, we can find the following snapshots being generated

zkevm:bungee_bridge

Snapshot builder: snapshotter/modules/computes/bungee_bridge.py

    {
      "project_type": "zkevm:bungee_bridge",
      "projects":[
        ],
      "preload_tasks":[
        "block_transactions"
      ],
      "processor":{
        "module": "snapshotter.modules.boost.bungee_bridge",
        "class_name": "BungeeBridgeProcessor"
      }
    },

Its preloader dependency is block_transactions as seen in the preloader configuration.

The snapshot builder then goes through all preloaded block transactions, filters out, and then generates relevant snapshots for wallet address that received funds from the Bungee Bridge refuel contract during that epoch.

https://github.com/PowerLoom/snapshotter-computes/blob/29199feab449ad0361b5867efcaae9854992966f/bungee_bridge.py#L40-L92

Find us