Praqma repository-standards issues

Praqma / repository-standards

MIT License

0 stars 1 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Describe alternative delivery methods (e.g. Ruby gem or bundle)

#24 buep opened 7 years ago
1
Secret handling

#23 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Implement create method

#22 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Implement repository-standards docker images

#21 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Design notes on (Praqma/customer relevance) as well relation to other of our repository

#20 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Persist for design, docs, notes and use-cases

#19 buep closed 7 years ago
1
Get CI, automation etc. up and running

#18 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Milestone: First delivery

#17 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Chose language for APIs

#16 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Waffle.io API ? Which ones exists?

#15 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Research existing Docker images with github API, relevant?

#14 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Automate it! Create, verify and monitor praqma repository standards

#13 buep closed 7 years ago
7
Honor the Github permission and team best practices we have

#12 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Truffle Hog should run on all our repo regularly

#11 buep opened 7 years ago
0
Please rename this repo

#10 lakruzz closed 8 years ago
2
close #2 Feedback on README 15 09 2016

#9 martinmosegaard closed 8 years ago
0
Naming conventions are missing

#8 buep opened 8 years ago
2
Guidelines are to complex already

#7 buep opened 8 years ago
6
Guidelines must be checked automatically

#6 buep opened 8 years ago
1
How do we evangelize the standard?

#5 martinmosegaard opened 8 years ago
1
Can we rename the repo please?

#4 martinmosegaard closed 8 years ago
4
Included Andreys inputs to the README.md file

#3 sofusalbertsen closed 8 years ago
2
Feedback on README 15-09-2016

#2 martinmosegaard closed 8 years ago
4
Few suggestions

#1 Andrey9kin opened 8 years ago
2