Conversation on the Missions

[TheGiraffe3]

Start the issue

[ProNooberEX]

Ok

[ProNooberEX]

I think you gave the same outfits to the Scan fleet that the Raiding Fleet uses While only the Scan Fleet obtaines the Quarg equipments as they are the ones boarding the Quarg ships

[TheGiraffe3]

You’re right. Do you want to try changing that or should I?

[ProNooberEX]

You’re right. Do you want to try changing that or should I?

I will do it myself, no worries, do you know which file the outiftter code lay in?

[TheGiraffe3]

At the bottom of your pull request where it says checks, some of them are failing. If you want to fix those, it would be helpful.

[TheGiraffe3]

sales.txt in the human folder.

[ProNooberEX]

At the bottom of your pull request where it says checks, some of them are failing. If you want to fix those, it would be helpful.

How do I view the checks themsleves?

[ProNooberEX]

Warning: fleet "Quarg Hunters" is referred to, but not fully defined. Warning: fleet "Quarg Jumpers" is referred to, but not fully defined. Warning: fleet "Quarg Planetary Defense" is referred to, but not fully defined. Warning: outfit "Javalin Turret" is referred to, but not fully defined. Warning: outfit "Modified Blaster Turrent" is referred to, but not fully defined. Warning: phrase "Quarg" is referred to, but not fully defined. Parse completed with at least one error(s). Didn't we define them in the txt files?

[ProNooberEX]

Warning: fleet "Quarg Hunters" is referred to, but not fully defined. Warning: fleet "Quarg Jumpers" is referred to, but not fully defined. Warning: fleet "Quarg Planetary Defense" is referred to, but not fully defined. Warning: outfit "Javalin Turret" is referred to, but not fully defined. Warning: outfit "Modified Blaster Turrent" is referred to, but not fully defined. Warning: phrase "Quarg" is referred to, but not fully defined. Parse completed with at least one error(s). Didn't we define them in the txt files?

[TheGiraffe3]

I have had problems with that too. The Quarg fleets may be trouble, but the things that are in the base game don’t need to be changed.

[ProNooberEX]

I'm curious on what are the remnant new missions for, may you explain it to me?(Also I thought we are suppose ot get permission from Zitchas before adding Remnant branches?)

[TheGiraffe3]

I wasn’t aware I added that. But it’s okay, because that was changed in the main game. I updated your branch to be the same as the base game’s branch, so it will be the same as in the old repository.

[TheGiraffe3]

If you click on the Files Changed tab, it won’t show that it got changed, because the master branch has that.

[ProNooberEX]

I know that in game tghere are two types of makrs, one with a bright light blue dot signalling go to there to complete missions and the other darker and says that one must jump to the systems without the need to land, how do I know which is the "mark" variable controlling?

[TheGiraffe3]

The bright one is a mission, the dark one is a waypoint. Mark is basically a new version of waypoint without the need to visit it. Mark is the dark blue, I think.

[TheGiraffe3]

@ProNooberEX any objections to me putting my mission in master?

[TheGiraffe3]

@ProNooberEX it looks like I've got both of our pull requests to no longer have problems! Please review mine, #10.

[ProNooberEX]

Ok I will

[TheGiraffe3]

Should I just squash it in now?

[ProNooberEX]

Go ahead, I've viewed the pirate 0 mission and its ok

Should I just squash it in now?

[TheGiraffe3]

Didn't tell me you'd reviewed it, but okay.

[TheGiraffe3]

Done.

[TheGiraffe3]

How about we open a new conversation issue?

[ProNooberEX]

How about we open a new conversation issue?

I think yes, because we both completed at least pirate mission 0 right?

[TheGiraffe3]

Right.

[ProNooberEX]

Right.

Then I suppose go ahead

[TheGiraffe3]

See #11.