QuiltMC / rfcs

Repository for requests for comments for proposing changes to the Quilt Project.
Other
61 stars 33 forks source link

RFC 0068: Remove "triage" wording from QSL rfc #71

Open TheGlitch76 opened 1 year ago

TheGlitch76 commented 1 year ago

Community managers feel it 's inappropriate to use "triage" to define a full Quilt Developer team.

CheaterCodes commented 1 year ago

We usually wouldn't put an FCP on small changes like this, but since I know that some poeple are still looking for better wording, I'll give them one FCP period to bring them up before we merge this.

Akarys42 commented 1 year ago

What's the conclusion here?

EnnuiL commented 1 year ago

As long as the conflict remains and no further discussion happens, we won't have a definitive conclusion

Akarys42 commented 1 year ago

Alright, I think the simplest way to about this is to leave three additional days for other ideas to come in, and vote on the different solutions. This will force this fairly minor problem to get resolved, and make this compliant with the rest of the RFCs.

TheGlitch76 commented 1 year ago

I want to clarify the reasoning behind this PR and my personal opinion on it.

This PR was made because Community Managers would not implement the RFC as written in our Toolchain Discord and name the team role "Team: QSL Triage" because it the naming is similar to the entirely different "Triage: Mappings" role, whose members are not full Quilt Developers. The understanding was that we'd continue to call the team "Team: QSL" and hash out the exact name details in a PR.

I also want to note that, following the established process to change QSL policies, this PR should be approved by all QSL Core Team members before merge.

I won't be engaging with this PR further for personal reasons, except to update it as directed by the QSL Core team.

Akarys42 commented 1 year ago

We've had a discussion on Discord about this RFC and reached the conclusion that QSL doesn't fit the organisation structure. I'll let someone from the team outline the changes required, do we want to work on them in this PR?