Closed nicholascar closed 3 years ago
From @rob-metalinkage:
I think vocab [ > collection ] [ > concept] would be ideal.
this is a suggested ideal scenario:
collections become irrelevant if following relationships , so
If you follow a broader relation then could trim to vocab > broader > narrower and highlight broader somehow?
if you follow a relationship to another concept vocab > concept > (relationship) concept2
if you follow a relationship to a concept in another vocab
vocab > concept > (relationship) > vocab2> concept
In terms of UX/UI Skosmos does this nicely
Can navigate by collection ("groups") in the sidebar, or hierarchy.
Vocab info - https://finto.fi/yso/en/ (see resource counts at bottom for concept/collection) Collection - https://finto.fi/yso/en/page/p26567 Concept - https://finto.fi/yso/en/page/p6898
Basic Breadcrumbs added to System, Vocabularies, Vocabulary & Concepts default templates. Fancier Breadcrumbs per-implementation, e.g. http://dawe.surroundaustralia.com/
not seeing breadcrumbs on concepts for that example... only on schemes.
That implementation doesn't seem to have Concept Breadcrumbs but the base templates now in VP do. We can fix that one as needed for the DAWE work - we will likely do lots of UI fixes on that over the next 2 months.
Vocab > [Collection >] Concept?
Clarify intention with @rob-metalinkage