Open tdhock opened 2 weeks ago
Well reverting will retain the issues in #5604 and #5277, wouldn't revdeps using importFrom instead of import in their NAMESPACE will solve both these issues and this new issue as well.
still if its seems like not worth it, then i can make a PR removing masks for .
and j
as only two of these are causing issues.
I think there's no rush to export the masks. let's revert . and J, then give these downstreams a very long heads up (>1 year) about our intent to export the masks before proceeding.
i can make a PR removing masks for . and j as only two of these are causing issues.
Yes, let's do that for 1.16.0. We'll target fixing the other two issues in 1.18.0 (at least one year from 1.16.0).
Revdeps affected
By
.
By
J
6125 caused new check issues with 17 revdeps, mostly because the
.
is also exported by plyr. alsorJava::J
in one package.Most fixes should be easy, revdeps should use importFrom instead of import in their NAMESPACE. Should I go ahead and start contacting revdeps? or should we consider reverting #6125 ?
animint2
AFM
Anaconda
EurosarcBayes
FAOSTAT
Fgmutils
PTXQC
antaresRead
dfmeta
distantia
eyeTrackR
growthcleanr
llama
lwqs
pda
rqPen
one package has a new error in examples https://github.com/psychbruce/FMAT/issues