Open atticusrussell opened 1 year ago
More info on this issue is also in #103.
@Gregwar do you have any ideas about how best to tackle this in the code?
I'd love to have a simple solution from the side of config.json where the "list_XXXXXXX" does not need to be specified, but is found internal to the program by specifying the plaintext name of the configuration in config.json.
From playing with the code a bit in the debugger, I don't think it's a super simple fix, but would love the perspective of others.
The presence of configurations in an Onshape document results in a bunch of internal API rubbish being added to the names of the created files. This makes the URDF pretty gross also. The way that configurations are handled in general is presently a bit broken - this is just one way the issue is manifesting itself.