content: rbk1

[nathcast]

This has to do with additional documents that are in broadbalk and listed in the page http://www.era.rothamsted.ac.uk/Broadbalk at the top.

If there is a link to a document wich is not a web page, I think it shoulf be a PDF and it should have a DOI therefore it can be linked into the database and in the html page by its DOI

Please review, edit and tick here when done

• [ ] doclist.html - table of content for this

• [ ] bbkdisease.html - Diseases

• [ ] bbkweeds.html - Weeds

• [ ] bbknutr.html -Crop nutrients

• [ ] bbkgrqual.html - Grain quality:

• [ ] bbkyields_other_crop.html - Other crops and fallow

• [ ] bbkearthworms.html - Earthworms

[Perrymas]

By review - do you mean to decide which should have a DOI or not? Or to actually create the DOIs...?

[nathcast]

This is to review the HTML pages. These will not have DOIs (I think) Decide if they are still relevant in the new site, and if they are accurate. I am going to remove the assignemnt because I am still working on them.. Sorry

[nathcast]

I have replaced the links to the PDFs to links to PDFs with new names in teh new site.

I have I think ironed out most problems

Please see if you still like these pages, and that are still relevant.

Thanks

[Perrymas]

By 'if we still like these pages' do you mean to check the pages on the current old website - or your new one?

[nathcast]

By 'if we still like these pages' do you mean to check the pages on the current old website - or your new one?

This is for the new web site. I dont think we need to update the old one unless there is something really wrong. I will explain on monday

[mglendining]

I have checked all the Broadbalk 'more' pages. They are all fine, except we need to add a link to the cropping DOI once it is minted. We don't need to mint dois for the other pdfs, except perhaps the lists of weeds.