Closed ayyy closed 11 years ago
You might've forked VoxelSniper before the latest push so it merged the latest upstream push into your fork.
Also, the ink-nophys brushes are pretty abstract. Why not use use combo-nophys?
Oh... I didn't even think about that. I was after the ink performers and after noticing they didn't exist I just added them.
The ink performer might naturally be no-physics. Seems like a redundant commit. I rarely use ink performers to begin with (but I can't speak for everyone).
It isn't no-phys naturally. And yea, it's a bit redundant now when you mentioned the combo performer, but I personally think it's worth adding, as there is a few occasions where they could be used and then theres people who don't think long enough to notice that the combo performer would work :p
Whenever I want to change the ink of something, combo is go-to. I totally forgot about ink.
I agree with Aero, although the commit seems good (except those missing empty last lines missing cringes) and it might be good to have a more complete set of performers for now. Gonna merge this.
This adds a few missing ink performers: IP, ICP, IIP, IMP. (Sorry, I have no idea where the 'Merge remote-tracking branch' commit came from and I'm terrible with Git.)