Open cng18 opened 2 years ago
Thank you very much! Do you work with certificated designs?
Hello Carlos, I did not get your question about certificated designs?
My last job function was Digital IP design. We had to certify/qualify our designs for some of the steps mentioned. Our delivery is not complete until all the steps are completed and signed-off. We had a comprehensive list of steps.
We had to certify that our design is able to synthesize in tools from different vendors. Likewise we had to certify that our design is CDC/RDC clean on a specific tool. And so on for various Design flow steps.
In the end we publish a report capturing the FlowStep-ToolName-ToolVersion for which the design is certified/qualified.
I liked your approach of vscode extension. I am pretty sure that this would be a much appreciated extension. I showed it to a few of my old colleagues and they were impressed with it.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 6:03 PM Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo < @.***> wrote:
Thank you very much! Do you work with certificated designs?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/TerosTechnology/vscode-terosHDL/issues/313#issuecomment-1094994407, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHQGII6J53TWVWTU57AIR6LVEQL3JANCNFSM5TCYPDUA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
That's cool! Could you send me an email to carlosruiznaranjo@gmail.com
I would like to discuss about the workflow in TerosHDL.
Hello Developers, First of all my sincere thanks for putting together this extension for vscode. Over the past few days I played around teroshdl-vscode. I would say that its a great step in bringing some order to the HDL dashboard. I experimented with the document generator and found it to be a great motivator for adding meaningful comments to the RTL code. I tried running Lint and synthesis using various tools and got it working after playing around with the settings a bit. During this trials I noted my findings. I feel that the whole thing can be made more intuitive. Let me explain what I mean:
I would breakdown a HDL design into following steps. A design has to be certified for all the Steps shown.
For each of the above steps we can choose one of the many available tools. And for the chosen tool we should be able to provide options.
So we have a Design Flow Step followed by the Tool to be used for that Step followed by Options to be passed to the tool for running that specific step.
Below I try to illustrate using example:
Example Steps: Step=Lint Check ---> Tool=Verilator ---> Verilator Options for Lint Check ---> Run Lint using Verilator Step=Lint Check ---> Tool=Vivado xvlog ----> Vivado xvlog options for Lint Check ----> Run Lint using Vivado Xvlog Step=Verification ---> Framework=Cocotb ---> Tool = Verilator ----> Verilator options for Simulation
Just wanted to share my thoughts. :-)