search

Touseefelahi / GigeVision

Simple GigeVision implementation, GVSP, GVCP protocol implemented
97 stars 31 forks source link

GVSP Timout #118

Closed blauertee closed 1 month ago

blauertee commented 1 month ago

Hello,

i'm working on the version of your code I ported to netstandard2.0 so strictly speaking this is probably not an issue with your code I'd be glad to get some support though.

This always throws I timeout even though I increased the timout to 10s.

Services/StreamReceiverBase.cs L106

socketRxRaw.Receive(singlePacket);

grafik

I can see the packages arriving via Wireshark:

View Table |No. |Time |Source |Destination |Protocol|Length|Info |PortRx| |-----|---------|-------------|---------------|--------|------|----------------------------------------------|------| |15765|18.091819|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVCP |60 |< WRITEREG_ACK (Success) |58779 | |15766|18.092827|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |86 |LEADER [Block ID: 1 Packet ID: 0] IMAGE |49162 | |15771|18.192977|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |60 |TRAILER [Block ID: 1 Packet ID: 3037] IMAGE |49162 | |15772|18.203959|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |86 |LEADER [Block ID: 2 Packet ID: 0] IMAGE |49162 | |15775|18.304057|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |60 |TRAILER [Block ID: 2 Packet ID: 3037] IMAGE |49162 | |15776|18.315259|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |86 |LEADER [Block ID: 3 Packet ID: 0] IMAGE |49162 | |15778|18.415274|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |60 |TRAILER [Block ID: 3 Packet ID: 3037] IMAGE |49162 | |15779|18.426275|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |86 |LEADER [Block ID: 4 Packet ID: 0] IMAGE |49162 | |15780|18.526572|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |60 |TRAILER [Block ID: 4 Packet ID: 3037] IMAGE |49162 | |15781|18.537360|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |86 |LEADER [Block ID: 5 Packet ID: 0] IMAGE |49162 | |15784|18.581734|192.168.2.153|255.255.255.255|GVCP |50 |> DISCOVERY_CMD |3956 | |15785|18.587371|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVCP |298 |< DISCOVERY_ACK (Lucid Vision Labs, 232200515)|59178 | |15786|18.637548|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |60 |TRAILER [Block ID: 5 Packet ID: 3037] IMAGE |49162 | |15795|18.648529|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |86 |LEADER [Block ID: 6 Packet ID: 0] IMAGE |49162 | |15798|18.748823|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |60 |TRAILER [Block ID: 6 Packet ID: 3037] IMAGE |49162 | |15799|18.759911|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |86 |LEADER [Block ID: 7 Packet ID: 0] IMAGE |49162 | |15810|18.860122|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |60 |TRAILER [Block ID: 7 Packet ID: 3037] IMAGE |49162 | |15811|18.870892|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |86 |LEADER [Block ID: 8 Packet ID: 0] IMAGE |49162 | |15812|18.970935|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |60 |TRAILER [Block ID: 8 Packet ID: 3037] IMAGE |49162 | |15813|18.982074|192.168.2.146|192.168.2.153 |GVSP |86 |LEADER [Block ID: 9 Packet ID: 0] IMAGE |49162 |

Any Idea how socket.Receive() can fail even though surely packages arrive at the bound port?

Thank's a lot! :)

blauertee commented 1 month ago

Sorry nvm it was the Windows defender blocing everything wouthout telling me anything about it. I couldn't check though because I did not have the neccessary priveleges.