Closed ItoErika closed 6 years ago
@vkhoo the points were not processed at all in the SQL table.
I also found typos in the descriptions and many descriptions were incomplete.
@vkhoo this source also has missing polygons. The "reclaimed areas" are holes in coverage. This isn't ideal. Why did you delete these from the original data?
there were null geometries in the lines for this source; all data should probably be checked again as this map had so many errors.
source_id 155
@cambro Is reclaimed area considered man-made? I was previously told it would be best to remove those. Will not remove in future!
Yes, @vkhoo please don't delete any polygons from maps, ever. It is fine to leave things like reservoirs, "reclaimed areas" (whatever that is) and other human-constructed features as-is with no age etc. but deleting them makes literal holes in the map that pose real problems in many different ways and doesn't reflect the actual intent of the mappers.
Info
Name: Geologic Map Of The Rattlesnake Hills 30' X 60' Quadrangle, Fremont And Natrona Counties, Wyoming
Source URL: GIS Data: http://www.wsgs.wyo.gov/gis-files/mapseries/100k/bedrock/gis-2003-ms-61.zip PDF: http://www.wsgs.wyo.gov/products/wsgs-2003-ms-61.pdf Descriptions: http://www.wsgs.wyo.gov/products/wsgs-2002-ofr-02.pdf
Folder name: Wyoming_RattlesnakeHills
Estimated scale: large
Number of bedrock polygons:
Lithology field: name Time field: age,early_id,late_id Stratigraphy name field: strat_name,hierarchy Description field: description Comments field:
Comments: In lines, units that I'm uncertain about after comparing the map data on QGIS and the pdf: LB,TF,LF,CeFr
Points contain information with units "sz" which appear to be scattered between being "shearzones" and angles for folds. Not sure what to do with it.
Todo: