Closed jeffro256 closed 4 months ago
This PR is invalid because it doesn't move commitment to K", C"
into the tx proposal prefix.
Input proposals DO commit to input commitment masks though (see SpInputProposalCore). Does the txid hash indirection still serve a purpose or could we make the txid faster?
They don't commit to the masks, since proposals with different masks produce the same proposal id. I don't remember the full context around this, but more flexibility in the tx id structure is good.
We got rid of the tx artifacts hash. The reason for it was a follows:
Input proposals DO commit to input commitment masks though (see
SpInputProposalCore
). Does the txid hash indirection still serve a purpose or could we make the txid faster?