UniversalDependencies / UD_English-EWT

English data
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
201 stars 42 forks source link

with-absolutes #240

Closed nschneid closed 3 years ago

nschneid commented 3 years ago

Absolute clauses with with may contain verbless predication. Now documented here.

These EWT sentences need to be fixed:

nschneid commented 3 years ago

....as well as these 6 sentences:

nschneid commented 3 years ago
nschneid commented 3 years ago

What about these pseudopossessive constructions? with ~ having + item + location

Adnominal attachment

Adverbial attachment

@amir-zeldes what do you think? GUM has at least one of these as a verbless clause ("But I'm pretty sure it's just cough drops with some vitamin C in it.") and at least 2 as nmods ("That insulation out there with the mice shit in it?", "that big red box with the dragons on it").

nschneid commented 3 years ago

I suppose these are verbless clauses because you can say "a T-shirt with me on it" or "I bought a T-shirt with myself on it", and PPs don't usually modify personal pronouns. It looks like CGEL agrees (example [iv]):

image

nschneid commented 3 years ago

(there are a few examples that are already correct, e.g. with an ADJ or PP as the embedded predicate)

nschneid commented 3 years ago
nschneid commented 3 years ago

I annotated these as advcl but should they be considered depictives, and thus annotated as acl dependents of the predicate?

Also the pseudopossessives listed above.

amir-zeldes commented 3 years ago

I agree these are clauses, will correct the two GUM cases. "sit with your legs crossed" I think is advcl (manner, adverbial not adnominal), same for admin in mind. Buffalo might be depictive (it is the state of the wings, not the manner in which they came out)