Standardly, it is just "we/us" and "you" that do this, though dialectal variants are possible like "keep them lovely kebabs coming" (EWT).
Arguably, "we/you" are acting as determiners, making the nominal definite and adding person features. (This is the CGEL analysis.) EWT follows this analysis: EWT PRON-as-det
But this is rare, and annotators/users might be surprised to see (what look like) pronouns in det position.
GUM has dep(guys, you).
The MNCs paper suggests nmod:desc.
Some other related things:
you idiot, you absolute fool, etc. (singular noun but I don't think these can be subjects) (Twitter discussion)
dep in GUM is intentional and generally applies as a placeholder for things we wanted to be nmod:desc (until whenever we decide to implement that, if we do)
I can't find an issue for this, though it came up in the Mischievous Nominals paper - example (5):
Standardly, it is just "we/us" and "you" that do this, though dialectal variants are possible like "keep them lovely kebabs coming" (EWT).
Arguably, "we/you" are acting as determiners, making the nominal definite and adding person features. (This is the CGEL analysis.) EWT follows this analysis: EWT PRON-as-
det
But this is rare, and annotators/users might be surprised to see (what look like) pronouns in
det
position.GUM has
dep(guys, you)
.The MNCs paper suggests
nmod:desc
.Some other related things:
det(you, all)
. EWT PRON-headeddet
nummod