UniversalDependencies / UD_English-EWT

English data
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
199 stars 42 forks source link

VERB-headed appos #437

Closed nschneid closed 10 months ago

nschneid commented 11 months ago

A lot of these look fishy to me: https://universal.grew.fr/?custom=65182c0944276

(I think the EVENT: DATE ones like "Koran descends to Earth: April 6, 610 AD Monday" are valid as key-value pairs in a list; https://universaldependencies.org/u/dep/appos.html)

nschneid commented 11 months ago
  • letter dated November 16, 2000

Let's consider an active voice variant: "I dated the letter November 16". Is that a sort of obligatory resultative? It's a bit nonprototypical for xcomp because you wouldn't say the letter is/became November 16, but by metonymy, the writing on the letter became that...a similar verb would be "label".

nschneid commented 10 months ago

@amir-zeldes curious for your input

amir-zeldes commented 10 months ago

I think this should be xcomp, it falls under the same general type as appointment verbs IMO (I appoint you president) - you're dating the letter X, and it is therefore so dated, a kind of performative action.

nschneid commented 10 months ago

OK. Does parataxis look good for the others?

amir-zeldes commented 10 months ago

LGTM, except "do volunteer work at the humane society, walk dogs, groom the animals etc.", since "etc." is analyzed as as conj effectively containing a cc, so maybe conj across the board makes more sense there (you can't say "and etc." so this is the only way to make an explicit coordination here)

nschneid commented 10 months ago
  • Maybe do volunteer work at the humane society, walk dogs, groom the animals etc.

Yes the "etc." is in a coordination, but I take walking the dogs and grooming the animals to be examples of volunteer work at the humane society. So "do" is not part of the coordination.

amir-zeldes commented 10 months ago

Oh, I see, that makes sense.