Closed nschneid closed 10 months ago
- letter dated November 16, 2000
Let's consider an active voice variant: "I dated the letter November 16". Is that a sort of obligatory resultative? It's a bit nonprototypical for xcomp
because you wouldn't say the letter is/became November 16, but by metonymy, the writing on the letter became that...a similar verb would be "label".
@amir-zeldes curious for your input
I think this should be xcomp, it falls under the same general type as appointment verbs IMO (I appoint you president) - you're dating the letter X, and it is therefore so dated, a kind of performative action.
OK. Does parataxis look good for the others?
LGTM, except "do volunteer work at the humane society, walk dogs, groom the animals etc.", since "etc." is analyzed as as conj effectively containing a cc, so maybe conj across the board makes more sense there (you can't say "and etc." so this is the only way to make an explicit coordination here)
- Maybe do volunteer work at the humane society, walk dogs, groom the animals etc.
Yes the "etc." is in a coordination, but I take walking the dogs and grooming the animals to be examples of volunteer work at the humane society. So "do" is not part of the coordination.
Oh, I see, that makes sense.
A lot of these look fishy to me: https://universal.grew.fr/?custom=65182c0944276
xcomp
?)parataxis
would be better)ccomp
, treating the colon like a commaparataxis
?parataxis
?parataxis
?)parataxis
?)(I think the EVENT: DATE ones like "Koran descends to Earth: April 6, 610 AD Monday" are valid as key-value pairs in a list; https://universaldependencies.org/u/dep/appos.html)