Open reillyeon opened 1 year ago
It seems this depends on Web Bundles which I don't think WebKit has taken a position on.
Note that this and Subresource loading with Web Bundles both depend on Web Bundles as an on-disk format but the interactions with the loading model are quite different.
FYI, Chromium is rolling out an implementation of this proposal in a limited fashion (admin-controlled installation for managed users on ChromeOS devices). See https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/iMfYonTs414.
WebKittens
@marcoscaceres @dcrousso
Title of the spec
Isolated Web Apps
URL to the spec
https://github.com/WICG/isolated-web-apps/blob/main/README.md
URL to the spec's repository
https://github.com/WICG/isolated-web-apps
Issue Tracker URL
No response
Explainer URL
No response
TAG Design Review URL
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/842
Mozilla standards-positions issue URL
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/799
WebKit Bugzilla URL
No response
Radar URL
No response
Description
This proposal provides a way to build applications using web technologies that will have useful security properties unavailable to normal web pages. To enable stronger security these applications are packaged into Web Bundles, signed by their developer, and distributed to end-users through one or more of the potential methods described in the explainer.
The explainer is divided into 4 documents:
I introduced this proposal to @marcoscaceres and @dcrousso at TPAC 2022 and they asked me to request this standards position.