Rename Hellhound

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: Hellhound should, imo, be renamed for two reasons: a) improving consistency - all other lycans, except bloody butcher, have the word "wolf" in their name: this also makes them easy to identify b) potential confusion with hell team - whilst i don't think actual confusion has been an issue, it really doesn't make sense to have a role called hellhound on a team other than hell

So, this is really two issues in one: should Hellhound be renamed, and if so, to what?

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: they do that with their vote too

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: but yeah

[CrowdfordBot]

e_thsn: I think the only way HH are good is if they can have the powers of 2 arbitrary wolves

[CrowdfordBot]

e_thsn: which actually could be used to make public lists slightly partial too

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: thats just lame

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: you can hide info by just hiding it

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: I'm good with removing HH honestly

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: the s9 use was specifically to mislead players about some bloody butchering going on I believe

[CrowdfordBot]

e_thsn: yeah

[CrowdfordBot]

the8thsoul: lmao

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange:

The role barely has any value as it, so we might as well remove it honestly

i would honestly go so far as to call hellhounds net zero value roles rn

[CrowdfordBot]

the8thsoul: wait

[CrowdfordBot]

the8thsoul: how can there even exist butchers if there wasn't a BB

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: i believe there was a BB

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: there was

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: I think we wanted them to think it was Bakers?

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: or something?

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: 2 HH and 2 Bakers?

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: I don't remember what the actual attempted misdirection was

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: oh maybe

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: but it was 2 Butcher, 1 BB and 1 HH

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: I don't know why we'd do that though since butchers usually out during N1 anyway

[CrowdfordBot]

the8thsoul: umm...

[CrowdfordBot]

the8thsoul: then how would HH even come into play?

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: it wouldn't

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: it was solely for list purposes

[CrowdfordBot]

the8thsoul: coz I swear it's only possible to start with only 1 BB right?

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: in season yeah

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: in os a rulechange allowing multiple BBs wouldn't be super amiss

[CrowdfordBot]

the8thsoul: ah ok

[CrowdfordBot]

the8thsoul: Makes sense now

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: anyway. we got offtopic. is anyone here against deleting HH before i ping the rest of the committee

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: clearly not

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange: <@&1045732542399131769>

Delete Hellhound, currently a basically net zero value role that we haven't used for its actual role purposes in seasons with a very bad name.

• delete!!!!!!
• no!!!!!!!!!!!!!
• needs renaming but deleting is overkill

[CrowdfordBot]

e_thsn: WG gonna be 1 of 3 single role catagories <:hepi:828690030419116133>

[CrowdfordBot]

e_thsn: nvm

[CrowdfordBot]

e_thsn: I forgot about coyote

[CrowdfordBot]

nottinghamshire: Hellhound is pretty boring unless you had a huge wolf vs solo game

[CrowdfordBot]

captain.luffy: Yeah there's no value in this role other than being a cool name

[CrowdfordBot]

venomousbirds: whats it with bad roles having great icons

[CrowdfordBot]

the8thsoul: Every role has status points

[CrowdfordBot]

the8thsoul: You either invest them all in "Icon" or all in "Concept"

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts:

<@&1045732542399131769>

Delete Hellhound, currently a basically net zero value role that we haven't used for its actual role purposes in seasons with a very bad name.

• delete!!!!!!
• no!!!!!!!!!!!!!
• needs renaming but deleting is overkill

i put evil ts votes so you may vote

[CrowdfordBot]

shapechange:

i put evil ts votes so you may vote

thanks bestie

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: passes

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: needs a pr

[CrowdfordBot]

mctsts: implemented 😦