WerewolvesRevamped / Werewolves-Roles

The role book for Werewolves Revamped
7 stars 8 forks source link

Flatten Cupid #1211

Closed CrowdfordBot closed 11 months ago

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: Simplify Cupid further: It always takes its lover alignment. If Cupid is demonized and turned Undead it still turns into an Undead Cupid etc, but that's still just an UAA role that takes the exact alignment of the lover, meaning lover will never change alignment. This would allow us to completely remove the concept of "current alignment"

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: Ur right. Is hags alignment or win condition changing

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: I guess it's alignment

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: they join an alignment on first wronging

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: which also explains their death winning

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: But to oracle, would it have the same alignment as let's say, chef

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: So I think its just an characteristic of UA roles that they update their own alignment

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: which is reasonable

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts:

But to oracle, would it have the same alignment as let's say, chef

no - Hags have an alignment, Chef is unaligned

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

e_thsn: I thought we said unaligned having an alignment was bad tho

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: before first wronging - No, as defined by Oracle

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: Honestly it'd probably be easier in many ways if it just changed win con and not alignment

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: but that once again gives us metaphysical issues

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: I can't wait for us to spend an entire month having these hilarious conversations

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: If we do win con, then Hags dont work

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: they wouldn't be on the same alignment

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: I mean it wouldn't even change wincon if it's wincon is "survive to see a team win that has yet to wrong hags"

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: yea but they death win

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange:

I thought we said unaligned having an alignment was bad tho

easy: once unaligned gain an alignment, they are no longer unaligned 🙂

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: which you can only do with an alignment

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: Ok so let me revise

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: "have a hag survive to see a team win that has yet to wrong hags. Also hags need to be wronged at least once "

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: but the dead hags cant reach that win con

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: cause they're dead

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: and dead ua's win cons arent evaluated

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: tho ig that can be changed

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy:

and dead ua's win cons arent evaluated

Well technically that isn't formally defined yet

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: yea <:pffffft:705639986384601110>

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: wait

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: i don't see how having alignment change is any more complex than this proposed other solution tbqh

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: but then Hags dont see hags as hag aligned

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: it seems like it just keeps on throwing up other problems

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: Yeah I think we're better off just saying that UAA roles are allowed to update their own alignment to join existing or new alignments

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: Is alignment better than win condition

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: yes

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: If we use alignment it immediately just gets used by everything else that uses alignments

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: If we had it so that uaa roles had an alignment and the rest didnt

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: That'd make it easier

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: nothing relies on win conditions

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: split UAA roles 🙂

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: UAA -> Change role Uidk -> Gain an alignment

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: But I think its fine as is

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: All UAA roles gain an alignment - either via role change or alignment change

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: do hags only gain an alignment after the first wronging?

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: I think so(?)

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: Who knows at this point

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: what happens if PH checks another hag before any wronging

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: I dont even know anymore what a role is

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts:

what happens if PH checks another hag before any wronging

I suppose they see "Unaligned"

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: thats stupid

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captainluffy: Does plague doctor have an alignment or a win condition