Closed CrowdfordBot closed 11 months ago
captainluffy: Ur right. Is hags alignment or win condition changing
captainluffy: I guess it's alignment
mctsts: they join an alignment on first wronging
mctsts: which also explains their death winning
captainluffy: But to oracle, would it have the same alignment as let's say, chef
mctsts: So I think its just an characteristic of UA roles that they update their own alignment
mctsts: which is reasonable
mctsts:
But to oracle, would it have the same alignment as let's say, chef
no - Hags have an alignment, Chef is unaligned
e_thsn: I thought we said unaligned having an alignment was bad tho
mctsts: before first wronging - No, as defined by Oracle
captainluffy: Honestly it'd probably be easier in many ways if it just changed win con and not alignment
shapechange: but that once again gives us metaphysical issues
mctsts: I can't wait for us to spend an entire month having these hilarious conversations
mctsts: If we do win con, then Hags dont work
mctsts: they wouldn't be on the same alignment
captainluffy: I mean it wouldn't even change wincon if it's wincon is "survive to see a team win that has yet to wrong hags"
mctsts: yea but they death win
shapechange:
I thought we said unaligned having an alignment was bad tho
easy: once unaligned gain an alignment, they are no longer unaligned 🙂
mctsts: which you can only do with an alignment
captainluffy: Ok so let me revise
captainluffy: "have a hag survive to see a team win that has yet to wrong hags. Also hags need to be wronged at least once "
mctsts: but the dead hags cant reach that win con
mctsts: cause they're dead
mctsts: and dead ua's win cons arent evaluated
mctsts: tho ig that can be changed
captainluffy:
and dead ua's win cons arent evaluated
Well technically that isn't formally defined yet
mctsts: yea <:pffffft:705639986384601110>
mctsts: wait
shapechange: i don't see how having alignment change is any more complex than this proposed other solution tbqh
mctsts: but then Hags dont see hags as hag aligned
shapechange: it seems like it just keeps on throwing up other problems
mctsts: Yeah I think we're better off just saying that UAA roles are allowed to update their own alignment to join existing or new alignments
captainluffy: Is alignment better than win condition
shapechange: yes
mctsts: If we use alignment it immediately just gets used by everything else that uses alignments
captainluffy: If we had it so that uaa roles had an alignment and the rest didnt
captainluffy: That'd make it easier
mctsts: nothing relies on win conditions
mctsts: split UAA roles 🙂
mctsts: UAA -> Change role Uidk -> Gain an alignment
mctsts: But I think its fine as is
mctsts: All UAA roles gain an alignment - either via role change or alignment change
shapechange: do hags only gain an alignment after the first wronging?
mctsts: I think so(?)
mctsts: Who knows at this point
shapechange: what happens if PH checks another hag before any wronging
mctsts: I dont even know anymore what a role is
mctsts:
what happens if PH checks another hag before any wronging
I suppose they see "Unaligned"
shapechange: thats stupid
captainluffy: Does plague doctor have an alignment or a win condition
mctsts: Simplify Cupid further: It always takes its lover alignment. If Cupid is demonized and turned Undead it still turns into an Undead Cupid etc, but that's still just an UAA role that takes the exact alignment of the lover, meaning lover will never change alignment. This would allow us to completely remove the concept of "current alignment"