Closed Fahdben closed 2 years ago
Results before the binarization :
ESA SCL
Sen2cor SCL with and without sc_only option
Difference between ESA SCL and Sen2cor SCL
ESA SCL (entire tile)
Sen2cor SCL (entire tile)
@Fahdben suggested to use ESA CCI and it solved the issue. https://www.esa-landcover-cci.org/?q=node/164
SCL values
L1C RGB image
ESA SCL
Results for Sen2Cor v2.9 (DEM = srtm)
Sen2cor v2.9 SCL without CCI
Sen2cor v2.9 SCL with CCI
Results for Sen2Cor v2.10 (DEM = copdem)
Sen2cor v2.10 SCL without CCI
Sen2cor v2.10 SCL with CCI
It is confirmed by this presentation which expose the differences between the local run and ESA production:
Therefore if we want mix L2A data produced by ESA and L2A produced by us with Sen2Cor 2.9 in a time series, we need to do that carefully to have homogenized time series:
@kvantricht noticed some strange patterns on the cloud mask provided over the tile 36MUD.
Note that the cloud mask shown above is the result of the binarization of the SCL from sen2cor. When comparing with the binary mask based on the SCL available on aws (ESA processing), we can clearly see that the patterns are no longer present (image on the right).
Cloud mask using ESA SCL
Cloud mask using Sen2cor SCL
The image shown in this example is
S2B_L2A_20190331T075609_N0211R035T36MUD_36MUD_MASK
.Here are some experiments (to run on 36MUD 20190331) that can help us find the origin of these patterns:
scl_only
option Compare the results of the two runs above with the SCL available through aws (before and after binarization).