Hi! I just read the paper of iMAS and find the formula 8. Theoretical speaking, the harder the sample is, the larger its gamma is. So for the hard samples, it is inappropriate to assign large proportion of strong augmentation. For the easy samples, the strong augmentation can be added without too much concern. So I think the correct formula is written as: A_s <- (1 - gamma) A_s + gamma A_w. But in the paper it is A_s <- (1 - gamma) A_w + gamma A_s. So I am confused by it. Could you please explain it? Thanks a lot!
Hi! I just read the paper of iMAS and find the formula 8. Theoretical speaking, the harder the sample is, the larger its gamma is. So for the hard samples, it is inappropriate to assign large proportion of strong augmentation. For the easy samples, the strong augmentation can be added without too much concern. So I think the correct formula is written as: A_s <- (1 - gamma) A_s + gamma A_w. But in the paper it is A_s <- (1 - gamma) A_w + gamma A_s. So I am confused by it. Could you please explain it? Thanks a lot!