[Feature]: Implement PR Title Checker workflow for Conventional Commit Prefixes

[harmeetsingh11]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Description:

The project would benefit from a PR title checker that ensures conformity to conventional commit prefixes. Currently, the following prefixes are considered valid:

• build:
• chore:
• docs:
• feat:
• fix:
• perf:
• refactor:
• revert:
• style:
• test:

Problem:

Enforcing consistent and descriptive PR titles following conventional commit prefixes helps maintain clarity and organization in the project's version history.

Describe the solution you'd like

Implement a PR title checker that validates each PR title against the specified conventional commit prefixes. This will ensure that PR titles adhere to the established guidelines.

To-Do:

• [ ] Develop the PR title checker script to verify titles against the defined prefixes.
• [ ] Integrate the checker into the project's CI/CD pipeline.
• [ ] Define error messages or warnings for non-compliant PR titles.

Checklist

• [X] I have starred the repository
• [X] I have checked the existing issues
• [X] I have read the discussion tab thoroughly and got the project idea
• [X] I am willing to work on this issue
• [X] I am an IWOC 2.0 contributor

[abhisheks008]

What are the factors will it check for checking the PR title? For me, the PR name should be same as the issue name. Can you implement that sort of workflow? @harmeetsingh11