Closed ZachBeck closed 2 years ago
@brigsz, @jacobdadams, @bgranberg, and others... What are the pros and cons from the planning and transportation perspectives of this request?
@ZachBeck I think that was a good recommendation to put the double track line work in the railroads dataset since it does sound like UTA is very interested in their data being single line.
should we have a quick meeting with Summer at UTA to better understand the proposed changes?
I would vote for discussing it further in our data meeting (it's on the agenda) and if our decision is something that would give UTA heartburn then talk with Sumer.
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@ZachBeck What was the decision from the data meeting on this? I assume that this issue is holding up #153?
I think I'm the hold up. I'm not really thrilled about any of the options but I think replace the existing trax data with the centerline version and move our trax features into railroads is probably the best route. I'll get moving on this the week of the 13th when I'm back in town.
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
Everything ok @gregbunce?
Ha! Yup. Sitting on an airplane trying to be productive for a moment using a phone. Allz good. I'll just get back to being unproductive. I think it will save me time.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 9:59 AM steveoh @.***> wrote:
Everything ok @gbunce https://github.com/gbunce?
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/agrc/porter/issues/152#issuecomment-923059602, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEA7QTDT3GGZ7JZNUP4JJZDUC5K5DANCNFSM5CKGJP4A .
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
Is this still being held up by @ZachBeck? Is there anything that I can do to help?
I'm still the hold up
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
Any update on this @ZachBeck?
Today is the day
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@ZachBeck has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
@ZachBeck has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@ZachBeck Are you waiting on me for anything related to this issue? If so, let me know.
check | status |
---|---|
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@ZachBeck has completed 0 out of 5 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 6 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
- Data Type | :+1: |
Is https://opendata.gis.utah.gov/datasets/utah-uta-light-rail-routes/explore?location=40.645640%2C-111.914994%2C-1.00 the open data layer for this? I'm confused by the publish date of September 11, 2017.
There is also a light rail routes on our website but the last update date is also 2017.
https://gis.utah.gov/data/transportation/transit/
@ZachBeck it looks like you are assigned all of those tasks so i think these questions are for you.
check | status |
---|---|
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@ZachBeck has completed 0 out of 5 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 2 out of 6 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
- Data Type | :+1: |
I'll bring it up in this weeks data team meeting, it seems like the past couple times we were derailed by naming conventions. Part of me would rather delete the issue as well.
Part of me would rather delete the issue as well.
Why do you want to delete the issue? The issue is letting us know we haven't finished the task yet.
I don't know... the single track vs double track representation seemed like splitting hairs to me. I'll try and get it wrapped up.
i can't remember, has this data been added to Internal?
No. Every time we were close to doing something we started debating what the name should be.
The bot is showing this dataset as existing in internal. Is that not the case?
Summary
This is could be a can of worms... UTA has requested that our existing double track representation of TRAX routes be replaced with a version showing the centerline for each route. Where the different TRAX routes (R, B, G) share the same physical tracks the centerlines overlap. I think UTA would prefer that TRANSPORTATION.LightRail_UTA be replaced with the new centerline version but there is value (i.e. multi modal) in keeping our existing double track data. Does it make sense to have 2 versions of TRAX in the SGID or would it be better to have the double track version available in TRANSPORTATION.Railroads?
The data should be available in
1 Check [x] all the areas where you expect the data to show up.
The data is of high quality
2021/00/00
)2021/00/00
)2021/00/00
)Where is the data source
Choose one.
Action items
name
with their github@name
.2021/00/00
)2021/00/00
)2021/00/00
)2021/00/00
)SGID.META.AGOLItems
record (@ZachBeck, completed:2021/00/00
)static
orshelved
item (@ZachBeck, completed:2021/00/00
):robot: Automation validation
name
with their github@name
.2020/01/01
when the task is verified.2022/02/21
)2021/00/00
)2021/00/00
)2021/00/00
)2021/00/00
)2021/00/00
)Notification
Group Task Assignments