lindsayad
commented
6 years ago I like the idea. I think Moltres_init (or hypen, whatever you want) would be enough
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Katy Huff notifications@github.com wrote:
The moltres paper deserves its own repo. (maybe it should have been in its own repo this whole time). In any case, I want to have a logical naming convention for all of the paper repos in this org... so I'm thinking I'll :
- create a repo called 2017-lindsay-moltres
- move the 2017-lindsay-moltres_init branch (along with all its history) to the master branch of that repo
- add a 'topic' label to that repo called 'paper' so that I can search my repositories for all the papers.
- and maybe try to divorce myself from this publications repo idea entirely....
Thoughts (@lindsayad https://github.com/lindsayad @andrewryh https://github.com/andrewryh @gridley https://github.com/gridley ) ? Better naming convention ideas? I don't love super long repo names, so maybe we can skip the year? Hopefully we choose this name cleverly enough that I can use this as a model for all future papers in the ARFC group...
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/arfc/publications/issues/69, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJxgcDXawhg6RuGpHAPM9JCNP3tBaNt1ks5s7BR7gaJpZM4QtS__ .
katyhuff
Daniel-Mietchen
The moltres paper deserves its own repo. (maybe it should have been in its own repo this whole time). In any case, I want to have a logical naming convention for all of the paper repos in this org... so I'm thinking I'll :
Thoughts (@lindsayad @andrewryh @gridley ) ? Better naming convention ideas? I don't love super long repo names, so maybe we can skip the year? Hopefully we choose this name cleverly enough that I can use this as a model for all future papers in the ARFC group...