Open nauticaldev opened 8 years ago
The detection method is based on heuristics, and in this case, it's just a false alarm. Besides, the source code is right there(even though it probably looks a bit confusing), so you could check for yourself whether it's a malware or not.
Also, what unsafe typecasts you specifically mean? Of course it has a lot of typecasting like you'd assume for a this kind of program. But I don't recall any of those casts being unsafe.
@jonathankoelzer The software dev does not need to explain himself in any way, he has provided software that no doubt he has spent considerable time on to you, for free.
If his typecasts are not to your liking perhaps you should volunteer some of YOUR time to the project.
As dev has said the source code is there in front of you, you even compiled it yourself. If there are false alarms you can use your 'obviously superior' coding skills to verify that there is nothing malicious.
The only person that needs to "Explain himself" is you, what gives you the right to act so disrespectfully whilst contributing nothing to the project? Explain yourself.
Aside from having software that was riddled with warnings and careless typecasting bitdefender detected your "do.exe" as malware during rebuild. Explain yourself