Closed icyflame closed 8 years ago
Rather than making a second IMU topic with the desired data format, I'd say replace the original. We have way too many original topic + converter package + modified topic clusters written as it is. Seems like a waste of transport and processing power.
@nevinvalsaraj I am afraid that completely replacing the old topic will cause unnecessary issues with old packages. And we should rather go for this kind of a migration procedure, with a pre-set date for the removal of the old topic entirely. (say 1 month from now, leading to around 4-5 pool testing days)
@icyflame That's fine. We can phase out the old topic, but my point being that this needs to be done rather than keeping both of them side-by-side. :+1:
Yes, @nevinvalsaraj . Actually, this also needs to be done for some older packages. Me and @prudhvid had decided that we would move all such packages into an obsolete/
folder. (Such as nqDvl
CPP package, trax IMU, etc).
Migration Procedure
sparton
package./kraken/sensor/imu_2
) (First pull request)@prudhvid @nevinvalsaraj Opinions on the above procedure?
cc @auviitkgp/developers