Closed James-Ngigi closed 5 years ago
I changed your strategy a little bit. Using SMA to determine the direction (CALL/PUT) and using 1.125 on the multiplier to recover. If you stick to one direction on the purchase, most of the times it will loose on the recovering bet.
This is good, it even safer i can see, i will test it for some time and see how it goes, in the mean time if you are able to create one like the one i provided above. Please tell me. Thanks alot btw,
just remove the blocks of the watch block (2) and put one type of purchase (Rise/Fall). After that change the 1.125 on result block (4) to 2.
and i have my strategy just like that
It worked, thank you again
can anyone help me please
Whats up?
i am not able to find xml file in above bot
download this and change this txt file to .xml binary-bot v1.1 for Jay's(SMA 1.125).txt
I think this strategy don't work with this kind of trades. Maybe with digits
ooh, well i'll try digits, but so far its going good, for me.
can you drop the bot that trades on digits using the same strategy?
change the market to even/odd and Even or Odd on block 2
great, lemme see
Impressive results so far with Even/Odd
It looks like it works on all markets, i tested it with 100 dollars as the deposit on a virtual account on the up/down trade type, left it to run the whole night and got some sleep, although i'd recommend the digits. Here are the results i'll test it with the daily reset indices. Those markets always react well to the bots i make
My result with Even / OLd
show us when the number of runs are past 500
@binary-ex-machina could you attach the latest bot for even/odd please? I am a bit lost in all those changes, to be honest.
thank you
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Binary Ex Machina <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Impressive results so far with Even/Odd
[image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/34610787/36569580-2083e94a-180d-11e8-9b40-1de29bbadf44.png
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/binary-com/binary-bot/issues/548#issuecomment-367855788, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABoK_WsWr-Evpolb9svWwuKGzDh7YALoks5tXfUsgaJpZM4SOLxo .
-- "Success is simple. Do what's right, the right way, at the right time."
best regards, tradakad
Hey @binary-ex-machina or anyone with the knowledge Can we change the type of contract when moving average starts changing direction at , example here, if there is a way to do that, modify the bot, see how it works, i suspect it will so better than it is now
I am also testing this bot. Its result are quite impressive. @okovalov Here is the one i'm testing for Over under. You can change the amountLoss to suit your risk appetite. This is set at 1.2 Digit Over under Oscar Martingale bot1.txt
@James-Ngigi you can change the direction based on the previews value of the indicator, but is better with 15min-1h charts, so the changes are not so volatility.
I saw some problems with this strategy. Many times I got the zig-zag effect on the trade when it try to recovers from the losses and the stake gets very big, so i decided to put a random effect on it. The main problem is that in a long run it can go at -$300 until it recovers, even if you start with 0.35 at the stake.
Results in the last 12 hours
I'll post the bot here and try to improve
@binary-ex-machina , i am presently trying it over and under, Over 2 gives payout of 34.3%. so recovery variable increased to 3. You get frequent number of wins.
The number of wins there is remarkable. Send the bot here as it is. Lets test it @xremmy
@xremmy i'll try with over 2 and send the results here
@James-Ngigi Here it is Over Under Recovery bot1.txt
Hi, @binary-ex-machina @James-Ngigi @xremmy Im testing this bot too with Digit Over 1, 2 and 3. the stake multiplier is 4.5, 2.5 & 1.6 respectively. But i saw stake reach above $200 on all bots which is too risky. Digit Even/odd also has the ability to reach that level. So i think its better to stick with a good fall/rise strategy as its has over 90% payout, for this money management, so the stake doesn't reach too high.. Im also testing with Fruitefella's trend follower, and another EMA bot, so far the stake didn't reach more than $45 and profits are over $30. I'll test more.. Just my observations on my today's tests.
Digit Over 1, Martingale 4.3, stake 0.35, 3 hours
@James-Ngigi @binary-ex-machina @okovalov @Jaywou911 @xremmy @Eshhh @sanjukala9 I tested this with the default settings and there can be a bad sequence too with Over 2 even with a stake of 0.35 (Volatility 100)
So going over 3 might not be a good idea in the long run, even in a shorter run too
Well, as Eshhh said, the best strategy to use will be a rise and fall strategy and probably on forex market.
in my tests, over 1 is the best so far. the problem with this strategy is when it hits the zig-zag effect. I think we can put block 4 like this
This way it will pass the zig zag effect, in theory.
Rise/Fall strategy falls in the same problem of the zig-zag effect. Even worse on the Forex, because the payout is lower and you will need to risky a lot more to recover.
The main problem with this strategy is that you need 2 wins to recover. Martingale can recover with one win.
Thanks for this strat !
I'm testing the last version of binary-ex-machina, 'cause I had a hit this afternoon with the default initial settings.
@binary-ex-machina @sanjukala9 @Jaywou911 @okovalov @xremmy The strategy is good, but it only has one problem and that's when the zigzag effect comes in place. So, i think the way around this is just to merge a strategy with this one to go around this problem. It will even trade great on the rise and fall market.
I think this is the only problem so far in this strategy, If anyone is able to overcome that i think we have the perfect strategy, or what say you?
Lets team up make this strategy happen. Thanks everyone for the participation.
we need to make a smart money management system by combining the recovery logic over martingale system or vice versa. For 90% payouts: For say if their is one loss the martingale system should come in to effect or just say if the loss amount is less than two/three stakes martingale system or else recovery system this way we might beat some unfavourable whiplashes with zig zag system . Theoretically it should save at least 50% of the zigzag . we never know but worth a good shot. The coding may be a piece of cake for @binary-ex-machina
@James-Ngigi ???????
@thehightechsol i love how you said "The coding should be a piece of cake for @binary-ex-machina
If the amount loss is higher then the initial stake x the MAxLoss, it applies martingale on a Loss.
We need to test what number of losses trigger the martingale and how much the martingale factor needs to be applied.
"the cake is a lie"
Can i get the block for this pic @binary-ex-machina I have spent 3 hrs trying to create it, i'm out of options
you have to know at least to copy these things Everything you need are in • Advanced>List • Binary>Indicators>Advanced • Math • Binary>Before Purchase
Thanks, took some time to figure out how to do it. found my way around though.
Martiangale kicked in after two losses...but with a loss of good amount. I think this strategy to be used in rise/fall or even odd so their wont be any lossess . For over under the martiangale factor should be 4.3 to recover .
Will this work. I am trying to kick in martingale after two or more losses. But an improvement that has to be made is to sum the losses for the martingale.
@thehightechsol Well that may work but i sat down and thought, whats really making this strategy a little bit problematic is the zigzag, only. So I thought of a solution around it
The zig zag is a sequence of up and down either once up once down or twice up and twice down, there comes the problem
So i made this strategy to come around that problem. The strategy trades on a sequence of odd numbers that is 1 or 3
This way when a zigzag trend comes in, it may be to our advantage especially with the sequence of 3 Look
I've been testing for the 1 sequence and its not staked above 51 dollars with 240 number of runs Here is the log logs.zip
And here is the bot, feel free to modify it if you come up with better idea's. We're open to listen binary-bot v1.8 sequence .zip
I'll test the 1 sequence for 1 day see the outcome
ok sounds exciting. This is what I intend to overcome. I trying with sequence 3. Anyone here have any idea about cheap windows vps servers .
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 1:38 PM, James notifications@github.com wrote:
@thehightechsol https://github.com/thehightechsol Well that may work but i sat down and thought, whats really making this strategy a little bit problematic is the zigzag, only. So I thought of a solution around it
The zig zag is a sequence of up and down either once up once down or twice up and twice down, there comes the problem
So i made this strategy to come around that problem. The strategy trades on a sequence of odd numbers that is 1 or 3
This way when a zigzag trend comes in, it may be to our advantage especially with the sequence of 3 Look [image: capture] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/28121458/36627382-ce960c8e-1952-11e8-9307-3c638887252b.PNG
I've been testing for the 1 sequence and its not staked above 51 dollars with 240 number of runs Here is the log logs.zip https://github.com/binary-com/binary-bot/files/1754148/logs.zip
And here is the bot, feel free to modify it if you come up with better idea's. We're open to listen binary-bot v1.8 sequence.zip https://github.com/binary-com/binary-bot/files/1754145/binary-bot.v1.8.sequence.zip
I'll test the 1 sequence for 1 day see the outcome
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/binary-com/binary-bot/issues/548#issuecomment-368209886, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI3XvgGzKTLlIKlJVKT84oh9krlsDDvUks5tX8NzgaJpZM4SOLxo .
Hey @thehightechsol . I see the sequence 3 isn't that good. It reached upto 1500 dollars stake and the number of runs are 330 so far, while on the sequence 1, its not reached even 150 dollars stake and the number of runs are just under 800
the results are very nice
@binary-ex-machina thats very encouraging. would you mind sharing your logs to see the zig zag whip lashes. What do you think this strategy with even/odd or call /put where the hit ratio is not so good in comparison to over.
So, is there anyone who can create this bot? I have all the details on this .pdf below. Thanks in advance, you have all been supportive. So here is my strategy.pdf If you are able to create it, please upload it here for testing