### ⚠️ This plugin is experimental and relies on [style queries](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_containment/Container_size_and_style_queries#container_style_queries_2) (via container queries), which are not yet widely supported in browsers.
The good news is that Safari and Firefox, the browsers lacking support, have already begun implementing style queries in their development versions, so it's only a matter of time before they're widely available.
See the browser compatibility table on [MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_containment/Container_size_and_style_queries#browser_compatibility) or [caniuse](https://caniuse.com/css-container-queries-style) for more information.
|
Signals for Tailwind CSS is a plugin that utilizes style queries (via container queries) to reactively enable a custom state, which can then be consumed by any of its descendants in the DOM.
signal
is similar to the existing group
variant/utility in that both provide methods for styling elements based on their ancestors' state. Unlike group
states, however, signal states can be explicitly signaled, allowing their state to be both set and consumed with a single, simple, unchained variant.
This reduces development effort and the need to compose a chain of variants, improving the developer experience with a more declarative API.
Depending on your use case, a traditional group
may make more sense, but often, particularly when managing a parent or ancestor state with anything more complex than a simple peer-X
or group-X
, a signal
may be a simpler option.
You can install the plugin via npm:
npm install tailwindcss-signals
Then, include it in your tailwind.config.js
:
module.exports = {
plugins: [
require('tailwindcss-signals'),
]
}
The plugin introduces the signal
variant, which can be used to apply styles based on an ancestor's signaled state.
Here's an example comparing the traditional approach with the new signals approach:
#### Example: Without Signals
```html
👈🏼 check/uncheck here
or hover here
|
#### Example: With Signals
```html
👈🏼 check/uncheck here
or hover here
|
Notice how, with signals, we don't have to use any arbitrary selector variants like [&>div]
and can instead apply those styles directly to the targeted descendants. This allows us to consolidate some redundancy in the parent so that whatever condition activates the signal only needs to be specified once rather than once per style/utility.
The benefits of Signals for Tailwind CSS become more apparent as the complexity of your styles and conditions increase.
signal
based on a descendant conditionThe general purpose of this plugin is to provide a declarative approach to applying styles based on an ancestor's state.
However, thanks to the power of the :has()
CSS pseudo-class, we can even activate a signal based on a descendant's state.
#### Example: Descendant condition
```html
👈🏼 check/uncheck here
```
Open this example in Tailwind Play: https://play.tailwindcss.com/YnlzSITNqF
or hover here
|
This is most useful for situations where you want to apply styles to an entire block based on the current state of one of its descendants.
Here are a few examples of cases where such a feature might be useful:
⚠️ Some cautions:
:has()
and could use a simpler pseudo-class variant such as…
focus-within:signal
instead of has-[:focus]:signal
valid:signal
instead of has-[:valid]:signal
(for a form
, which checks if all form contents are valid):has()
, but for use cases where you would need it, it would likely still be simpler than the alternative.When using multiple signals, you may run into situations where you want one signal nested in another, which could cause issues. In that case, you can distinguish signals apart by naming them using the modifier syntax built into Tailwind CSS, the same naming convention used for group
and peer
variants.
#### Example: Naming a signal
```html
👈🏼 check/uncheck here
✨ hover/unhover here ✨
press me
|
By giving a signal a name, you can ensure it is unique and doesn't conflict with other signals. You can name a signal by adding a slash and the name after the signal
variant, like signal/{name}
.
Consuming a named signal is the same as consuming a regular signal, but with the name appended to the variant: signal/{name}
.
For more information on this modifier syntax, see Differentiating peers from the official Tailwind CS documentation.
Signals for Tailwind CSS provides a more declarative and straightforward approach to applying styles based on an ancestor's state. Leveraging style queries (via container queries) eliminates the need for complex selector chaining and arbitrary targeting, resulting in a cleaner and more maintainable codebase.
This plugin is particularly useful for:
⚠️ Browser support for style queries is still limited, so Signals for Tailwind CSS may not be suitable for projects that require broad compatibility.
The good news is that Safari and Firefox, the browsers lacking support, have already begun implementing style queries in their development versions, so it's only a matter of time before they're widely available.
See the browser compatibility table on MDN or caniuse for more information.
I hope you find tailwindcss-signals
a valuable addition to your projects. If you have any issues or suggestions, don't hesitate to open an issue or pull request.
If you liked this, you might also like my other Tailwind CSS plugins:
shadow-border
utilities too ✨)