As reported by @rzach in https://github.com/vlmantova/bookml/issues/11, when using \usepackage[cal=boondoxo]{mathalfa}, LaTeXML should redefine \mathcal as an alias for \mathscr. As of now, it annotates the output of \mathcal with the class ltx_math_caligraphic and so BookML ends up using the wrong font.
This will become marginally more serious if you merge #2244, as the characters themselves will get the wrong Unicode variation selector, and so browsers and MathJax will show the wrong glyphs (if and when UVSs get implemented more widely).
I suppose there may be other packages where \mathcal is actually roundhand and need a similar treatment.
As reported by @rzach in https://github.com/vlmantova/bookml/issues/11, when using
\usepackage[cal=boondoxo]{mathalfa}
, LaTeXML should redefine\mathcal
as an alias for\mathscr
. As of now, it annotates the output of\mathcal
with the classltx_math_caligraphic
and so BookML ends up using the wrong font.This will become marginally more serious if you merge #2244, as the characters themselves will get the wrong Unicode variation selector, and so browsers and MathJax will show the wrong glyphs (if and when UVSs get implemented more widely).
I suppose there may be other packages where
\mathcal
is actually roundhand and need a similar treatment.