Closed dginev closed 10 months ago
I think I tend to prefer one of the variants we discussed, like --noinvisibletimes
, for example. There isn't really a good solution, but there is clearly at least a temporary need.
So why don't you take a fresh look, change the option name if you want to, and then go ahead & merge it whichever way you feel good about :>
--noinvisibletimes
works, thanks!
Fixes #1941 . At least it allows it to be fixed, via a new option.
Here is a draft following some offline discussions on allowing a customization switch for preferring zero-width space (U+200B) over invisible times (U+2062) in implied
<mo>
elements.The PR minimally touches up the character in post-processing, via the
MathML::stylizeContent
sub.An easy test is:
I have exposed the option in latexmlpost and latexmlc. But not yet in latexmlmath (maybe later).