This addresses the short-term symptom of the main test suite failing. texlive 2022 and texlive 2023 have differences in pgf and tikz, which may lead to (sometimes reasonable) markup discrepancies in the latexml-generated XML under each texlive.
For now, we avoid testing entirely in such fragile situations. Instead we have an extra target, which can be optionally ran via:
CI=true make extratest
The extra tests are currently expecting a texlive 2022 to succeed.
Some of these extras also needed an update following the recent schema changes in latexml, so I've added that update to this PR. I have also checked that the regular tests pass under texlive 2022 and texlive 2023.
Note that the CI tests did not pass under texlive 2023 before this PR, and still do not with it. Those details are tracked by issue #2044, which we deferred to the next milestone (0.8.9)
Fixes #2313
This addresses the short-term symptom of the main test suite failing. texlive 2022 and texlive 2023 have differences in pgf and tikz, which may lead to (sometimes reasonable) markup discrepancies in the latexml-generated XML under each texlive.
For now, we avoid testing entirely in such fragile situations. Instead we have an extra target, which can be optionally ran via:
The extra tests are currently expecting a
texlive 2022to succeed.Some of these extras also needed an update following the recent schema changes in latexml, so I've added that update to this PR. I have also checked that the regular tests pass under texlive 2022 and texlive 2023.
Note that the CI tests did not pass under texlive 2023 before this PR, and still do not with it. Those details are tracked by issue #2044, which we deferred to the next milestone (0.8.9)