tikz-related update to jheppub.sty.ltxml

[dginev]

This PR originates from testing #2325 . It can be merged as a follow-up.

The jheppub.sty.ltxml binding was a little outdated. I noticed a case where tikz-cd.sty wasn't loading despite having fresh latexml support (arXiv:2112.10658).

As it turns out, jheppub.sty now has that as a dependency, as well as a handful of others. Added here.

[dginev]

Ah, wrong - this is more sinister. The arXiv package attaches its own jheppub.sty, with a completely unmodified header from the official 2013 original, but seemingly modified contents?

I think I have unearthed that today's official jheppub.sty is located at: https://jhep.sissa.it/jhep/help/JHEP/TeXclass/DOCS/jheppub.sty

And yet that file doesn't have any mention of tikz... The arXiv:2112.10658 one has the header lines:

%% jheppub.sty
%% Copyright 2013 SISSA Medialab
%
% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3
% of this license or (at your option) any later version.
% The latest version of this license is in
%   http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
% and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX
% version 2005/12/01 or later.
%
% This work has the LPPL maintenance status `author-maintained'.
%
% The Current Maintainer of this work is
% SISSA Medialab <info@medialab.sissa.it>
%
% This work consists of the file jheppub.sty.
\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
\ProvidesPackage{jheppub}[2013/03/21 r534]

But I am suspicious whether that r534 jheppub actually has the tikz mention. Closing here until I am sure this can be solved "officially".

[dginev]

Right, here is another online copy of the r534 versioned jheppub.sty, which seems to be the only current hit in google:

https://github.com/HSF/documents/blob/master/CWP/papers/HSF-CWP-2017-02_training/latex/jheppub.sty

There is no mention of tikz at all. So I am lead to believe the sty in arXiv:2112.10658 is a modified version distributed without changing anything in the sty metadata... There isn't much we can do here that wouldn't be really dirty, so I'll shelve this (and sustain some undefined:{tikzcd} errors that stem from it).

Taken from the sandbox report at: https://corpora.mathweb.org/corpus/sandbox%5Farxiv%5Ftikz%5Fcd/tex%5Fto%5Fhtml/error/undefined/%7Btikzcd%7D?all=false