search

canada-ca / OS-Advisory_Conseil-SO

Open Source Advisory Board - Conseil consultatif du logiciel libre
Apache License 2.0
38 stars 26 forks source link

Single platform for gc repo vs. approved platforms + catelog #105

Open nschonni opened 5 years ago

nschonni commented 5 years ago

I'm wondering if an alternate approach is just a catelog like https://code.gov/ I do think that there should be an offer of a platform internally that internal groups can collaborate (GCcode), but when it comes to open source, there are existing projects on multiple platforms already that shouldn't have to move to meet a single winning platform (EX: WET on GitHub vs. AsseblyLine on BitBucket). Along with the catelog, there should be a recommendation of platforms that meet those functional and non-functional requirements, but I don't think a single choice/lock-in is the best approavh.

gcharest commented 5 years ago

I was just thinking that... Let's go back to what the needs are...

Le mer. 9 janv. 2019 17 h 29, Nick Schonning notifications@github.com a écrit :

I'm wondering if an alternate approach is just a catelog like https://code.gov/ I do think that there should be an offer of a platform internally that internal groups can collaborate (GCcode), but when it comes to open source, there are existing projects on multiple platforms already that shouldn't have to move to meet a single winning platform (EX: WET on GitHub vs. AsseblyLine on BitBucket). Along with the catelog, there should be a recommendation of platforms that meet those functional and non-functional requirements, but I don't think a single choice/lock-in is the best approavh.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/canada-ca/OS-Advisory_Conseil-SO/issues/105, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnJ5Ux2KZ6t0lJNYLL7Gxd9PiqX0_Rjks5vBl9wgaJpZM4Z4S4Y .

gcharest commented 5 years ago

Just wanted to confirm this question has been discussed at the Advisory Board meeting and further requirements analysis is going to be needed for the overall solution recommended..