Closed viralp closed 2 years ago
It looks like your MS has 8 spectral windows. Not sure how/if the selfcal worker copes with this (@KshitijT?) I can see cubical is using spw 0, while wsclean is presumably trying to read them all, hence the error.
Come to think of it, I'm not even sure how wsclean itself copes with multiple SPWs?
It looks like your MS has 8 spectral windows. Not sure how/if the selfcal worker copes with this (@KshitijT?) I can see cubical is using spw 0, while wsclean is presumably trying to read them all, hence the error.
Come to think of it, I'm not even sure how wsclean itself copes with multiple SPWs?
There's a "spwid" parameter for the selfcal worker which maps to Cubical and should take care of multiple spws. As you say, @o-smirnov , wsclean seems to be imaging all the spws, so that should be fine; though there is a 'spws' option for wsclean for selecting which spectral windows to image - we don't have that in CARACal yet, however.
@KshitijT, I am not specifying any particular spws, so by default does cubical take all spws?
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:52 AM Kshitij Thorat @.***> wrote:
It looks like your MS has 8 spectral windows. Not sure how/if the selfcal worker copes with this @.*** https://github.com/KshitijT?) I can see cubical is using spw 0, while wsclean is presumably trying to read them all, hence the error.
Come to think of it, I'm not even sure how wsclean itself copes with multiple SPWs?
There's a "spwid" parameter for the selfcal worker which maps to Cubical and should take care of multiple spws. As you say, @o-smirnov https://github.com/o-smirnov , wsclean seems to be imaging all the spws, so that should be fine; though there is a 'spws' option for wsclean for selecting which spectral windows to image - we don't have that in CARACal yet, however.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/caracal-pipeline/caracal/issues/1360#issuecomment-888976181, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABBBM44NJQIBWPWD3XZU3P3T2EQGTANCNFSM5BFISP2Q .
-- Postdoctoral Research Fellow South African Radio Astronomy Observatory (SARAO) and Rhodes University Square Kilometre Array, Cape Town South Africa
Well I can see from the log that it's been told to process spw 0 only (--sel-ddid 0
). It should be able to take multiple spws if you say --sel-ddid None
, which is actually the default.
@KshitijT, I am not specifying any particular spws, so by default does cubical take all spws? … On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:52 AM Kshitij Thorat @.> wrote: It looks like your MS has 8 spectral windows. Not sure how/if the selfcal worker copes with this @. https://github.com/KshitijT?) I can see cubical is using spw 0, while wsclean is presumably trying to read them all, hence the error. Come to think of it, I'm not even sure how wsclean itself copes with multiple SPWs? There's a "spwid" parameter for the selfcal worker which maps to Cubical and should take care of multiple spws. As you say, @o-smirnov https://github.com/o-smirnov , wsclean seems to be imaging all the spws, so that should be fine; though there is a 'spws' option for wsclean for selecting which spectral windows to image - we don't have that in CARACal yet, however. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1360 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABBBM44NJQIBWPWD3XZU3P3T2EQGTANCNFSM5BFISP2Q . -- Postdoctoral Research Fellow South African Radio Astronomy Observatory (SARAO) and Rhodes University Square Kilometre Array, Cape Town South Africa
https://github.com/caracal-pipeline/caracal/blob/master/caracal/schema/selfcal_schema.yml#L57
The default is "0" - so only the 1st spw.
Right, but then wsclean must be told to only process the first spw too, otherwise the calibration and imaging invocations within selfcal are not mutually consistent.
Right, but then wsclean must be told to only process the first spw too, otherwise the calibration and imaging invocations within selfcal are not mutually consistent.
Sorry, I was not clear. I meant that @viralp can give a list of all the spws manually and then Cubical should calibrate them fine and since wsclean is anyway imaging all the spws; it should be sorted?
Yes, that'll sort @viralp but it still leaves a trap for the next unwary user. I think if the spw is set, then the same value should be passed to cubical and wsclean, otherwise you get these incomprehensible errors.
Yes, that'll sort @viralp but it still leaves a trap for the next unwary user. I think if the spw is set, then the same value should be passed to cubical and wsclean, otherwise you get these incomprehensible errors.
Yes, we should definitely do that !
Yes I agree with @o-smirnov, spwid
should be common for both cubical and wsclean. Thanks.
While the branch hotfix_#1360
has fixed @viralp 's original issue; Cubical seems to give trouble if 'sel-ddid' of anything except 0 or null is provided:
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] found 1 frequency chunks: 0 11
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] applying TAQL query 'FIELD_ID == 0 && DATA_DESC_ID IN [1]' (5/40 rows selected)
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] 64 antennas, 5 rows, 1/8 DDIDs, 2 timeslots, 2 corrs
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] DDID central frequencies are at 1.03 GHz
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] Input model feed rotation disabled, PA rotation disabled
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] Output visibilities derotation disabled
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] Using 1 model(s) for 1 directions(s) (DDEs explicitly disabled)
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] model 0 (weight WEIGHT_SPECTRUM):
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] direction 0: MODEL_DATA
INFO 10:55:23 - main [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] subtraction directions set to slice(None, None, None)
INFO 10:55:23 - param_db [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] creating /stimela_mount/output/phase-0.parmdb in fragmented mode
INFO 10:55:23 - gain_machine [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] G solutions will be saved to /stimela_mount/output/phase-0.parmdb
ERROR 10:55:23 - casa_db_adaptor [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] Gaintables cannot be written in Python 3 mode due to current casacore implementation issues
INFO 10:55:23 - param_db [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] creating /stimela_mount/output/delayself_0-BBC-field_0-ddid_1.parmdb in fragmented mode
INFO 10:55:23 - gain_machine [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] will compute & save suggested baseline-based corrections (BBCs) to /stimela_mount/output/delayself_0-BBC-field_0-ddid_1.parmdb
INFO 10:55:23 - gain_machine [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] (these can optionally be applied in a subsequent CubiCal run)
INFO 10:55:23 - main [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] defining chunks (time 1, freq 0, also when SCAN_NUMBER jumps > 1.0)
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] read indexing columns (5 total rows)
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] built timeslot index (2 unique timestamps)
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] max chunk size is 1 timeslots and/or -- seconds
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] found 2 time chunks: 0:0:0 1:1:1 2
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] generated 2 row chunks based on time and DDID
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] row chunks yield 2 potential tiles
INFO 10:55:23 - data_handler [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] coarsening this to 1 tiles (max 2 chunks per tile, based on 1/0 requested)
INFO 10:55:23 - main [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] single-process, single-thread mode
INFO 10:55:23 - main [0.2 4.4 0.0Gb] Exiting with exception: KeyError(0)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/cubical/main.py", line 548, in main
estimate_mem(ms, tile_list, GD["data"], GD["dist"])
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/cubical/data_handler/wisdom.py", line 24, in estimate_mem
along_freq = len(data_handler.freqchunks[0])
KeyError: 0
Funny that it's the wisdom file throwing up the error, though. Any clues @o-smirnov , @SpheMakh ?
@JSKenyon take a look at this please?
Yeah, doing so. The problem is that chanfreqs
or freqchunks
is a dictionary, not a list. Should be easy to fix.
@o-smirnov https://github.com/ratt-ru/CubiCal/pull/454 needs your review. Should fix this problem.
The fix has been merged into CubiCal master. Is it possible for you to try it out and confirm that it fixes the issue? Once it is confirmed, I can do a release for you.
The fix has been merged into CubiCal master. Is it possible for you to try it out and confirm that it fixes the issue? Once it is confirmed, I can do a release for you.
Will check it out and report back. Thanks for a super quick fix !
The stimela branch cubical-16Nov2021 (thanks @SpheMakh !) which has the new Cubical (thanks @JSKenyon !) seems perfectly happy with sel-ddid with non-zero values !
The branch in question was merged last year in stimela master so I am closing this issue. Please reopen if needed.
Hi I am getting the following error in wsclean (after the cubical run)
The previous cubical run was completed without severe error except the following.
log-selfcal-calibrate-cubical-field0-iter1-20210725-160301.txt log-selfcal-image-field0-iter2-20210725-160301.txt