search

chin-rcip / collections-model

Linked Open Data Development at the Canadian Heritage Information Network - Développement en données ouvertes et liées au Réseau canadien d'information sur le patrimoine
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
12 stars 1 forks source link

Issue #12 - How to model the priority of an actor in the production of an artefact? #12

Closed chin-rcip closed 4 years ago

chin-rcip commented 4 years ago

In the v1.5 of the Target Model, the priority of the creator within the production event is modeled with the pattern: E39_Actor(creator)->P02i_is_ranged_of->PC14_Carried_out_by->P2_has_type->E55Type(Priority)->"Priority"

Does the priority need to be linked to the PC14 Carried out by with a P2 has type, as it is now, or with the property P14.1 in the role of, just like the role of the actor? E39_Actor(creator)->P02i_is_ranged_of->PC14_Carried_out_by->P14.1_in_the_role_of->E55Type(Priority)->"Priority"

Or should the priority be linked not to the PC14 Carried out by but to the role (E55 Type) with the property P2 has type, as follows: E39_Actor(creator)->P02i_is_ranged_of->PC14_Carried_out_by->P14.1_in_the_role_of->E55_Type(Role)->P2_has_type->E55Type(Priority)->"Priority"

George Bruseker, in the Artefact Semantic Reference Data Model, modeled this priority linked to the PC14 with the Priority P14.1 in the role of.

Habennin commented 4 years ago

If you put the type on the type then you are not qualifying the role at the moment but the role as such. So you would be saying that 'painter' is always 'first' for example. This would be semantically incorrect.

stephenhart8 commented 4 years ago

Indeed, therefore the only correct solution is number 2, with the property P14.1 in the role of and then the E55 Type for the priority. I can close this issue unless there is something to add.

Habennin commented 4 years ago

+1

illip commented 4 years ago

It looks strange to me to use PC14.1 for the priority but the definition of p14.1 is quite broad (allows the nature of an actor's participation to be specified), so I'm fine with it :)

That said, if we use PC14.1 for the role and the priority I think we need a e55->p2->e55 pattern to distinguish them.

So, +1

stephenhart8 commented 4 years ago

The modifications have been made to the Target Model, this issue is closed.

VladimirAlexiev commented 4 years ago

@stephenhart8 @illip @Habennin This assumes "priority" is a concept.

But scholarly articles have a numeric author order. That's why WD has prop https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1545 "series ordinal". Eg see how it's used for a paper: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q58295578.

I assume the same holds about art publications such as exhibition catalogs, catalogs raisonne, etc