search

chin-rcip / collections-model

Linked Open Data Development at the Canadian Heritage Information Network - Développement en données ouvertes et liées au Réseau canadien d'information sur le patrimoine
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
12 stars 1 forks source link

Issue #20 – What to do with the “Remarks” field in some museums? #20

Closed chin-rcip closed 4 years ago

chin-rcip commented 4 years ago

Most of the museum dataset have a kind of miscellaneous field, often called "remarks" that contains some various information that could not be documented elsewhere in their dataset (this is the case in Artist in Canada). This kind of field contains various kind of information and is therefore not consistent. What should CHIN do with this kind of information? Should CHIN create a "remark" field?

KarineLeonardBrouillet commented 4 years ago

Yes it would be useful especially if we consider text mining some of these description in the future to extract more data.

Habennin commented 4 years ago

There is already a pattern for that in your modelling. I mean you can use the

E73 -> p 190 -> Literal E73 -> p2 has type ->E55 'Curatorial Note' E73 -> p2 has type -> E55 'Curatorial Note' - > p2 ->E55 Description E73 -> p94i -> E65 -> p14 ->E39

pattern in order to model this. Chin could coin its own uri for 'curatorial note' but I think AAT is also doing this for linked.art.

stephenhart8 commented 4 years ago

This "Curatorial Note" pattern has been added to the TM 2.0 and will be tested in the following month. I propose to close this issue.

Habennin commented 4 years ago

+1 to closing

illip commented 4 years ago

@stephenhart8 +1 to closing!

stephenhart8 commented 4 years ago

By general agreement, I close this issue.