Issue #35 - Should we date the appellations?

chin-rcip / collections-model

Linked Open Data Development at the Canadian Heritage Information Network - Développement en données ouvertes et liées au Réseau canadien d'information sur le patrimoine

Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal

12 stars 1 forks source link

Issue #35 - Should we date the appellations? #35

Closed stephenhart8 closed 4 years ago

stephenhart8 commented 4 years ago

I remember that one of the important features for some institutions was to be able to date the appellations. With CIDOC FRBRoo, and its event F52 Name Use Activity, it would be quite easy to model it. There's the pattern: CiC_Issue35-example1 https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KC_9k25wPLUygNUaBHXNbtAxNLv7Vs8S The property R61 occurred in kind of context allows us to specify in which context the name was used.

Do you think it would be a good pattern to implement in the model?

KarineLeonardBrouillet commented 4 years ago

I think it would be useful in some instances such as:

An actor changing their name at some point in their life (e.g. I change my name to Eleanor at 45)
Dating an artist name (e.g. J.K. Rowling who wrote adult books under the name Robert Galbraith)
Representing changes in scientific knowledge and thus knowing that an appellation is the latest one recognized by a field

eecanning commented 4 years ago

Habennin commented 4 years ago

stephenhart8 commented 4 years ago

Agreed by all, it has been implemented in the TM

VladimirAlexiev commented 4 years ago

@stephenhart8 @KarineLeonardBrouillet all of that is good.

But does the TM specify "which context" or give examples? In particular, I think you should codify the use of pseudonyms (i.e. have such concept).

And maybe artist duos? Or these are always represented as a small Group?