Open KaroEngstrom opened 2 years ago
@TracyLinder I'd love to icebox this. When we've discussed this in the past, I think the consensus is that this specific ROW Court Case feature isn't big enough (in terms of users and volume) to warrant its own accounts dash for supervisors in Data Tracker. It seems to be working well for them w/o this functionality.
@KaroEngstrom i think you may have commented on the wrong issue. This one is for AMD, not ROW.
@TracyLinder Sorry, I mixed up the pieces and dragged you into it when I should have tagged @dianamartin
@dianamartin This came out of the Contractor Transactions mini-feature we built. I don't think we wanted to build this for the low number of transactions and users. Can we icebox it? The main issue would be not having a way to work around other Data Tracker permissions.
I think Billy, Ed and Jorge can get "Account Administration" access which I believe they already have.
We talked to stakeholders several months back and decided that this wasn't an urgent priority. Iceboxing this issue for now.
As a Supervisor in Signal Management, I want to be able to be able to manage Contractor Transfer of Ownership user accounts so that correct users have access to creating Contractor Transfer Forms.
Related to a problem? Data Tracker has existing accounts with various user roles. The task is to allow management of specific user roles without exposing all of them to the account manager for a small slice of Data Tracker functionality.
Desired Outcome? Ability for the supervisor to add and remove Contractor Transactions users independently from the application (without needing to put in a DTS SR). Original ask: "Billy, Edward, and I will need to be able to add, edit, or remove COA employee names."
Additional Context? Building on #9766
Acceptance criteria
This issue is at same status as #10172 Create Auto-Assign Functionality for Court Case System