cityofaustin / atd-data-tech

Austin Transportation Data & Technology Services
17 stars 2 forks source link

"Rapid Response" column in Roadway Markings Work Orders dataset incorrectly named and populated with blank values #11143

Closed atdservicebot closed 1 year ago

atdservicebot commented 1 year ago

What application are you using?

Other / Not sure

Describe the problem.

Socrata Open Data Portal - Rapid Response column in the roadway markings work orders dataset now show blanks instead of TRUE/FALSE. It might have been because of the field name change for Rapid Response Maintenance Yes/No to Safety Device Maintenance Yes/No.

I would like to have the column name changed to Safety Device Maintenance and to have the column populated with TRUE/FALSE as reflected in data tracker.

Website Address

https://data.austintexas.gov/Transportation-and-Mobility/Roadway-Markings-Work-Orders/nyhn-669r

Internet Browser: Firefox

Requested By Susanne G.

Request ID: DTS23-106095

patrickm02L commented 1 year ago

Rewrote the User Story from the description above.

As a user of the Socrata Open Data Portal, I want the "Rapid Response" column in the "roadway markings work orders" dataset to be renamed as "Safety Device Maintenance" and have the values populated with "TRUE" or "FALSE" so that I can easily understand the data and use it for my analysis. This change will allow me to accurately interpret the data and make informed decisions based on it.

ChristinaTremel commented 1 year ago

From SMD sprint review, if it can be fixed in the next few weeks or so this is a high priority.

Needs to be coordinated with Prod and Dev. Can batch it with the AMD request.

amenity commented 1 year ago

@dianamartin @ChristinaTremel - we talked about this "type" of issue in Prod+Dev sync. From a dev perspective, it would be helpful to have an issue template for these so that they include a checklist of the kinda weird steps the devs need to perform. Is there any specific info that would be useful for the apps team?

@johnclary when you get time - could you fill out the Dev steps for these types of issues?

Looking at this issue and #11322 drafting a template here (please edit directly):


[Open Data Schema Update]

General

Specs

Old Name New Name Note

Steps

ex. If the request is Open Data Portal (ODP), remove the steps for updating ArcGIS Online (AGOL) and vice versa..

If Open Data ETL from Knack

Apps

The field names in Knack need to exactly match, except for capitalization, the field names in AGOL and Socrata In Knack parlance, field names are called "Labels".

ODP (Apps)

Updating Open Data Portal GitBook reference

Dev

If ArcGIS Online ETL from Knack

Apps

The field names in Knack need to exactly match, except for capitalization, the field names in AGOL and Socrata In Knack parlance, field names are called "Labels".

AGOL (Geo)

Updating ArcGIS Online feature layer GitBook reference

Dev

cc/ @Charlie-Henry @chiaberry @johnclary @mddilley

ChristinaTremel commented 1 year ago

@amenity - @dianamartin and I worked on updating the steps above ⬆️ . We included two scenarios for these ETL type requests:

We included the steps that would be useful for the apps team and the geo team with these requests!

ChristinaTremel commented 1 year ago

@KaroEngstrom will update the ODP field in advance to match! Will schedule time with Dev to update the script.

KaroEngstrom commented 1 year ago

W 3/8/23

chiaberry commented 1 year ago

@KaroEngstrom & @ChristinaTremel , I ran the steps to update the metadata in postgrest and then rerun all the records to socrata, but the column was still showing up blank.

Then I checked the view in knack, and that column is blank there too, which means theres nothing for socrata to get from that column. Should the column be currently blank in knack?

ChristinaTremel commented 1 year ago

@chiaberry Many of the rows will be blank because this field was added July 2022 and any work order created before that time won't have data in this field. I'm actually looking at the ODP dataset and I'm seeing ~970 records with information and it looks to be as recent as records created 3/8/2023. So I think it's working! 🙂

chiaberry commented 1 year ago

Yay! My dev side is done then, can we close the issue?

ChristinaTremel commented 1 year ago

I think we can! Let me update Signs & Markings that this has been completed - I'll update the Github issue with what I send and close it out.

ChristinaTremel commented 1 year ago

Sent Susanne message: Hey there! The "Safety Device Maintenance" field on the Markings Work Orders in the open data portal is now working!!  It's been updated to reflect the new field name and I see data in that field as recent as 3/8. Link to the Dataset.