Closed ChristinaTremel closed 1 year ago
Finally got a chance to review this issue and see what the current pages look like
reimbursements page
Reimbursable Tracking
from Reimburesable Trackings
Signs | Reimbursements
andMarkings | Reimbursements
Reimbursement Approvals
with similar menu button
Signs | Reimbursement Approvals
and Markings | Reimbursement Approvals
?Christina mentions _Table of invoices that have date
invoice details
and work order details
Field Headings on table
On (new) "Reimbursable Invoice" table
reimburseable_tracking
Approver
- Accounts - connection field
Comments
- paragraph text
FM it hit Budget
- 01
(ex. Jan)Date/Time
Add “Too Small for Reimbursement” column to DT. Intent of this field is to identify and mark any invoices that are too small to pursue reimbursement. Would be interested in what functionality there is to maybe grey out the line in the table if marked as too small. Or strikethrough? Something to help indicate that that work order/invoice will not be going forward in the process.
[x] Rename “Labor Invoice Date” column to “Contract Labor Invoice Date”
[x] Rename “PE/PM for Approval” date column to “Invoice Date”
Enhancement Request: have it auto populate when Johnny creates the invoice
• Ramona noted that she still sees the occasional issue where unit costs aren’t correct
• Don’t need the FM Budget
column in DT, can remove
• Don’t need CIP
Y/N column in DT
• Don’t need another Bond
Y/N column in DT, the existing “Bond?” Yes/No column serves this function
User Story
Once an invoice has been created by Johnny and reviewed and sent to the requester by Ramona, would there be the functionality to have Ramona pinged (email?) when the invoice has been with the requester for more than a certain amount of time. Maybe 5 business days? This would let her know to follow up with that requester to keep the invoice moving.
We occasionally have issues with funding that are not noticed until Finance is processing the invoices. Ideally, the requester would identify any lack of funding when review the invoice but sometimes they need a reminder. Looking to add language to the affect of “please ensure there is sufficient funding in the FDU to cover the full amount of this invoice prior to approving” somewhere in the process (email to requester letting them know their approval is needed, language on the review/approval page requester looks at, pop up box when approving?). Don’t need it everywhere, just curious on options and where the best place would be.
Invoice approver will be the requester who submitted the work order. There is already a requester field in the table (ATSD, Safe Routs, V0, etc.), can another column be called Requester and say the person who submitted the work order (and therefore the person who will review and approve the invoice)? Or should we determine a different name for the invoice approver? Maybe Invoice Approver
reimburseable_tracking
object, field Labor Invoice Date
, rename to Contract Labor Invoice Date
reimburseable_tracking
for "Submitted PE PM for Approval" field to match field "Invoice Date"I don't know which table this is..?
On (new) "Reimbursable Invoice" table
Tried trigger, I didn't like it. Chose to do "edit form" instead. There is a record rule to set the date.
reimburseable_tracking
Approver
- Accounts - connection field
Comments
- paragraph text
FM it hit Budget
- 01
(ex. Jan)Date/Time
SAM19-014270
It's acting buggy
Reference from Chrispin INSERT
UPDATE RECORD
work_order_markings
objectSELF CONNECTION work_order_markings
- work_order_markings
WO MARKINGS PARENT ID
didn't need this one
On the New Work Order form
MRK23-030560
, did not seem like this worked though..
SELF CONNECTION work_order_marking
WO MARKINGS PARENT ID
- short textSELF CONNECTION work order signs/markings
- set to reimbursable_tracking_work_orderFDU
is Yes
Approver
- logged in AccountsMRK23-030565
Need to configure the changes from TEST to PROD
SELF CONNECTION work_order_marking
WO MARKINGS PARENT ID
- short textSELF CONNECTION work order signs/markings
- set to reimbursable_tracking_work_orderFDU
is Yes
Approver
- logged in Accounts@ChristinaTremel Will need you to test the creation of a Markings WO and see if a reimbursement record generates. Also, do we need to configure this on the Signs Work Order too?
I checked the SMD Tracker in PROD and looks like Susanne got the "Reimbursable Reporting" table looking pretty good, checked display and records rules on the table and they're all in there.
@dianamartin I tested the creation of the markings WO/reimbursement record this morning and the notes are in your comment above. Looks like the reimbursable records are being generated! It does need to be configured on Signs Work Orders as well. 🙏🏼
And yay! I think the only think we have left is the actual approve invoice page, but SMD doesn't need that functionality until October. I think I'm going to split this issue up and create a separate issue for the "Approve Invoice" page so we can schedule that in a future sprint.
SELF CONNECTION work_order_signs
WO SIGNS PARENT ID
- short textSELF CONNECTION work order signs/markings
- set to reimbursable_tracking_work_orderFDU
is Yes
Approver
- logged in AccountsClosing, as we separated the other feature in a new issue #13485
New “Approve Invoice” page and process for the Requesters