cityofaustin / atd-data-tech

Austin Transportation Data & Technology Services
17 stars 2 forks source link

New ROW Report: Public Projects with Multiple Deficiencies (LP) - (LP to Review) #14056

Open atdservicebot opened 1 year ago

atdservicebot commented 1 year ago

Acceptance Criteria

What application are you using?

AMANDA

Describe the problem.

The ROW division manager would like a new AMANDA report that compiles all of the RW, EX, DS, and PSM folders submitted as Public Projects or CIPs that have at least three attempt results of "Deficiencies" in the Traffic Control Inspection (50685) process.

Describe the outcome you'd like to see when this feature is implemented.

ROW will be able to better monitor and track public projects that have repeat deficiencies.

Describe any workarounds you currently have in place or alternative solutions you've considered.

Using the Custom Fields Data Explorer.

Requested By Kyle K.

Request ID: DTS23-110080

KyleErich commented 1 year ago

Relevant Pick Values from the Project Sponsor list in the Info tab:

The report's parameters can be based on the date of the most recent Attempt Result of "Deficiencies" (not by Folder Status). Allow the user to select a date range.

KyleErich commented 11 months ago

@TracyLinder @vschandramouli Ryan asked me about the status of this card today and what kind of timeline we can expect for implementation. Is there an estimate that we can give him?

vschandramouli commented 11 months ago

Hi @TracyLinder @KyleErich

Just FYI, I believe I have enough on this card to write AC after discussions with Kyle. I can have this On Deck in a couple days.

vschandramouli commented 11 months ago

Updated AC, moving to Backlog.

TracyLinder commented 11 months ago

@Nadin-Nader FYI - I told ROW they should be seeing a draft report around 11/1 - do you think that's possible?

Lpriya-LIT commented 10 months ago

@Nadin-Nader Done commit and shared the deployment plan to you in email.

Nadin-Nader commented 10 months ago

@Lpriya-LIT this was sent to the DevOps CM Team to be deployed to DEV under SCTASK0374432

Nadin-Nader commented 9 months ago

@Lpriya-LIT this has been deployed to DEV please UAT

TracyLinder commented 9 months ago

Priya said report not yet working. It has been reverted in DEV and she is working on it.

TracyLinder commented 9 months ago

@Nadin-Nader this isn't urgent however Ryan is asking for updates. Just FYI.

Lpriya-LIT commented 9 months ago

@Nadin-Nader Created Test deployment request, SCTASK0383869

Nadin-Nader commented 9 months ago

@Lpriya-LIT where are you on this?

Lpriya-LIT commented 9 months ago

@Nadin-Nader DevOps related changed are deployed to Test , will verify and create request for manual deployment related to report configuration

Lpriya-LIT commented 8 months ago

Update - Working with Amanda support team to deploy Report configuration related changes in Dev and Test

TracyLinder commented 8 months ago

We looked at Priya's sample reports today. @KyleErich will speak to Ryan and confirm these items:

KyleErich commented 8 months ago

@Lpriya-LIT @TracyLinder

Also, could you attach the two demo examples to this card so I can present to the division manager? I'm leaning towards the first one shown but also want to solicit his feedback.

Thank you!

Lpriya-LIT commented 8 months ago

@KyleErich Attached pdf copy of the reports

Lpriya-LIT commented 8 months ago

Deficiency Report.pdf

Lpriya-LIT commented 8 months ago

Deficiency Report - 1.pdf

KyleErich commented 8 months ago

@Lpriya-LIT Let's go with the first option. As mentioned in my last post, let's add a column titled Right-of-Way Contractor and include the associated ROW Contractor people record for all these permits. AC has been updated to include this column. Thanks.

If we need a title for the report, it can be called Public Projects with Multiple Deficiencies.

Lpriya-LIT commented 8 months ago

@Nadin-Nader Created manual deployment request ,SCTASK0392569

Nadin-Nader commented 7 months ago

@Lpriya-LIT this has been deployed to TEST please UAT

Nadin-Nader commented 4 months ago

@Lpriya-LIT is this ready for the users to UAT?

KyleErich commented 4 months ago

I queried a large date range on this new report, and it indicates "No Data Found", so perhaps it isn't pulling data correctly? Although I suppose it's possible that on AMANDA Test there just happen to not be any examples of cases where there's 3+ deficiencies attempts. image

TracyLinder commented 3 months ago

@Lpriya-LIT reminder to review Kyle's feedback.

Lpriya-LIT commented 2 months ago

Update - The report is fetching data in Crystal report tool but there is no data in Amanda . Looks like there is some issue with the date format . Trying to fix the issue

Lpriya-LIT commented 2 months ago
image.png
TracyLinder commented 1 month ago

This needs to go back on deck for Priya to find the root cause of the report not pulling in data, even though the crystal report is working.