ROW Portal: Update forms to apply conditional logic to Submitting Agency

[atdservicebot]

Enhancement to apply conditional logic to the Submitting Agency Field.

• [ ] Create 2 new fields.
• [ ] Update the apply for TCP form with the conditional logic.

What application are you using?

Right of Way Portal

Describe the problem.

ROW Knack Portal: When selecting an option from the Submitting Agency dropdown in the Traffic Control Plan Application page, we want certain options to trigger an additional Yes/No field titled "Is this project associated with a General Permit or Site Plan application reviewed through the Public Project Review unit?" Further, when this new field is selected "Yes", we want an additional required freeform field to show up titled "GP or SP case number", where the user should enter the applicable GP or SP case number.

Options from Submitting Agency that should trigger these fields:

• Austin Transit Partnership
• Austin Transportation - Arterial Management Division
• Austin Transportation - Office of Special Events
• Austin Transportation - Transportation Engineering Division
• Austin Water - Distribution System Engineering Division
• Capital Metro (CapMetro)
• Public Works Dept - Engineering Services Division
• Watershed Protection Department - Project Design and Delivery Division
• Other

Describe the outcome you'd like to see when this feature is implemented.

ROW Engineering will be able to have data to track which public projects are associated with the Public Project Review unit and which are not, and be able to more easily delineate review responsibilities between members of staff, as ROW Engineering has a dedicated Public Project Review reviewer that should only be receiving these particular projects for review. The onus should be on the customer to inform us about the nature of their project.

Describe any workarounds you currently have in place or alternative solutions you've considered.

Manually determining whether projects are associated with Public Project Review.

Requested By Kyle K.

Attachment (45.88kb)

Request ID: DTS24-112485

[TracyLinder]

Kyle and I are meeting on 2/20 to scope this.

[TracyLinder]

We'll need to keep in mind or somehow document that any future values added to submitting agency we should ask if the logic applies.

[TracyLinder]

Refinement

• Diana says it may be better to do an exclusion on the list versus an inclusion list.