Open atdservicebot opened 1 month ago
I think we have enough information to write the acceptance criteria before needing to meet with ROW about it. This request wasn't prioritized for scoping for November, so I'm not assigning it to Vish yet.
Reminding myself that this is the folder info that triggers the creation of a child UC folder on the SP.
We are updating the description of the formal review infos/processes the ROW-UC team uses on Land Development Folders (like SP), from "R.O.W. Review" to "Utility Coordination Review"
In Scope Elements:
Are there multiple docs for each folder type (SP, GP)?
AMANDA
UC: The Utility Coordination team would like to rename the "R.O.W. Review" process (51295) and the Info fields "R.O.W. Review?" (61125) and "R.O.W. Reviewer" (61130) to "Utility Coordination Review", "Utility Coordination Review?", and "Utility Coordination Reviewer", respectively. The codes should remain the same, so as to avoid confusion/disruption.
The name of this review will be more accurate to what is being reviewed.
Note to self: DSD teams, especially PUPR, will need to be notified of these changes once headed to Prod.
N/A
Request ID: DTS24-118640