cityofaustin / atd-data-tech

Austin Transportation Data & Technology Services
17 stars 2 forks source link

Create New Feature Layer for Contractor Work Orders API #9817

Closed KaroEngstrom closed 2 years ago

KaroEngstrom commented 2 years ago

This is part 2 of #7441

dianamartin commented 2 years ago

@andrewshensky We would like to request a new feature layer for the "Contractor Work Orders"

Let me know if you have any questions. SMD would like to have this soonish. I can ask Christina the time frame.

andrewshensky commented 2 years ago

@dianamartin I have a couple questions below:

dianamartin commented 2 years ago

@andrewshensky

These are the field types from Knack

Work_Order_ID Text  
Created By Text  
Created Date Date  
Modified Date Date  
Work_Order_ID Text  
Parent WO Text  
Parent WO - FIELD Text  
Work_Authorization_Number Number  
Assigned Contractor Text  
Assigned To Text  
GIS_ID Text  
Instructions Comments Text Max length
Follow-up Instructions Text Max length
From Street Text  
To Street Text  
Street Display Name Text  
Area Text  
Centerline Miles Number  
Work Order Status Text  
ATD Issued Date Date  
Contractor Submitted Date Date  
Contractor Submitted By Text  
Count Attachments Number  
Count Comments Number  
Count Inspections Number  
Count Work log Number  
Work Status Text  
Primary Parent WO Text  
recordID Text  
GIS QA Text  
STREET_SEGMENT_IDS Text  
WORK_GROUPS Text  

@andrewshensky cc: @johnclary there is a Marking Work Order feature class but it's not showing up properly in AGOL, she submitted a new bug issue #9907

andrewshensky commented 2 years ago

@dianamartin I have created a the new feature in layer in AGOL through the link below. It is currently shared to the public to match other similar layers. Let me know if any changes need to be made to the data or settings.

https://austin.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=65457b568fb94e92a7790a947c7b6690

dianamartin commented 2 years ago

@andrewshensky I finally figured out where the markings work order feature layer information is, I'm wondering if you need to create the feature layer under this ATD_Publisher_Scripts account instead.

I was looking at the field names and it's all caps with all underbars, do you think we need to match it to be the same?

dianamartin commented 2 years ago

Pavement Markings Work Order Feature image

Contractor Work Orders image

andrewshensky commented 2 years ago

@dianamartin I have updated the Contractor Work Order data structure to be in all caps for consistency with other datasets. The dataset is also published through the ATD_Publisher_Scripts account. Let me know if any other modifications are needed. The link to the data in AGOL is below:

https://austin.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=7eb2da1d8e6c4f79b368d8e295dec969

image

dianamartin commented 2 years ago

Thanks Andrew, I'll check it out - if all seems well I can ask the devs to make the ETL happen