search

clarity-h2020 / emikat

http://www.emikat.at/?lang=en
1 stars 0 forks source link

Missing WMS Layers #49

Closed p-a-s-c-a-l closed 4 years ago

p-a-s-c-a-l commented 4 years ago

[Impact results combined] for each Scenario, Time period, typical Events and for each Adaptation Project:

HW_DAMAGEQUANITITY (number of affected persons) not working:

https://service.emikat.at/geoserver/clarity/wms?CQL_FILTER=STUDY_VARIANT=%27BASELINE%27%20and%20TIME_PERIOD=%27Baseline%27%20AND%20EMISSIONS_SCENARIO=%27Baseline%27%20AND%20EVENT_FREQUENCY=%27Rare%27%20AND%20SZ_ID=3183&&service=WMS&request=GetMap&version=1.1.1&layers=clarity%3Aview.3155&styles=HW_DAMAGEQUANITITY%0D%0A&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&tileSize=1536&info_format=application%2Fjson&width=960&height=446&srs=EPSG%3A3857&bbox=1819048.399130625%2C6144357.077504019%2C1823634.6208277354%2C6146487.75966747

<ServiceException code="StyleNotDefined">
      No such style: HW_DAMAGEQUANITITY
</ServiceException></ServiceExceptionReport>
p-a-s-c-a-l commented 4 years ago

HW_DAMAGEPROBABILITY not working:

https://service.emikat.at/geoserver/clarity/wms?CQL_FILTER=STUDY_VARIANT=%27BASELINE%27%20and%20TIME_PERIOD=%27Baseline%27%20AND%20EMISSIONS_SCENARIO=%27Baseline%27%20AND%20EVENT_FREQUENCY=%27Rare%27%20AND%20SZ_ID=3183&&service=WMS&request=GetMap&version=1.1.1&layers=clarity%3Aview.3155&styles=HW_DAMAGEPROBABILITY%0D%0A&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&tileSize=1536&info_format=application%2Fjson&width=960&height=446&srs=EPSG%3A3857&bbox=1819206.050501463%2C6144352.300189752%2C1823792.2721985737%2C6146482.9823532

<ServiceException code="StyleNotDefined">
      No such style: HW_DAMAGEQUANITITY
</ServiceException></ServiceExceptionReport>

Test with Map Component&emikat_id=3183&datapackage_uuid=2434ce93-93d4-4ca2-8618-a2de768d3f16&write_permissions=1&time_period=Baseline&emissions_scenario=Baseline&event_frequency=Rare&grouping_tag=taxonomy_term--hazards) for Study 25.

Related Data Package Resource: Heat mortality risk/impact screening

p-a-s-c-a-l commented 4 years ago

PF_DAMAGEPROPABILITY not working :

https://service.emikat.at/geoserver/clarity/wms?CQL_FILTER=STUDY_VARIANT=%27BASELINE%27%20and%20TIME_PERIOD=%27Baseline%27%20AND%20EMISSIONS_SCENARIO=%27Baseline%27%20AND%20EVENT_FREQUENCY=%27Rare%27%20AND%20SZ_ID=3183&&service=WMS&request=GetMap&version=1.1.1&layers=clarity%3Aview.3155&styles=HW_DAMAGEPROBABILITY%0D%0A&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&tileSize=1536&info_format=application%2Fjson&width=960&height=446&srs=EPSG%3A3857&bbox=1819206.050501463%2C6144352.300189752%2C1823792.2721985737%2C6146482.9823532

<ServiceException code="StyleNotDefined">
      No such style: HW_DAMAGEQUANITITY
</ServiceException></ServiceExceptionReport>

Test with Map Component&emikat_id=3183&datapackage_uuid=2434ce93-93d4-4ca2-8618-a2de768d3f16&write_permissions=1&time_period=Baseline&emissions_scenario=Baseline&event_frequency=Rare&grouping_tag=taxonomy_term--hazards) for Study 25.

Related Data Package Resource: Pluvial Flood risk/impact screening

humerh commented 4 years ago

Schreibweise ist: HW_DAMAGEQUANTITY (statt HW_DAMAGEQUANITITY) Das sollte der Fehler sein.

Ich schaue gleich im Wiki nach, ob mich verschrieben habe.

p-a-s-c-a-l commented 4 years ago

HW_DAMAGEQUANTITY (statt HW_DAMAGEQUANITITY)

OK. Thanks.

Open issues: no styles PF_DAMAGEPROPABILITY and HW_DAMAGEPROBABILITY in view 3155

humerh commented 4 years ago

The correct spelling is: HW_DAMAGEPROBABILITY PF_DAMAGEPROBABILITY

sorry for these spelling errors.

p-a-s-c-a-l commented 4 years ago

Thanks. HW_DAMAGEPROBABILITY is working now but PF_DAMAGEPROBABILITY not:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE ServiceExceptionReport 
SYSTEM "https://service.emikat.at/geoserver/schemas/wms/1.1.1/WMS_exception_1_1_1.dtd"> 
<ServiceExceptionReport version="1.1.1" >   <
ServiceException code="StyleNotDefined">
      No such style: PF_DAMAGEPROBABILITY
</ServiceException>
</ServiceExceptionReport>
p-a-s-c-a-l commented 4 years ago

The layers "heat damage probability" and "flood damage probability" I think can be removed, since they are not useful to end users

See https://github.com/clarity-h2020/csis/issues/154#issuecomment-669331990

So no further action regarding PF_DAMAGEPROBABILITY required.