Closed p-a-s-c-a-l closed 4 years ago
In addition, it seems that the style for HW_DISCOMFORT_LEVEL needs to be adjusted. See https://github.com/clarity-h2020/csis/issues/154#issuecomment-670526066.
Population so OK?
Definitely better that green. Need to see how it look on a map.
On Sat, 8 Aug 2020, 11:13 Heinrich Humer, notifications@github.com wrote:
Population so OK? [image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20284964/89706659-1deb2f80-d968-11ea-8d1e-bc7f19101798.png
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/clarity-h2020/emikat/issues/54#issuecomment-670848827, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWTC7SN4LG6BNUJGRY43T3R7UJLBANCNFSM4PXVNHMA .
In addition, it seems that the style for HW_DISCOMFORT_LEVEL needs to be adjusted. See clarity-h2020/csis#154 (comment).
I found an error. Is it now ok?
I look online and found that there are three layers showing population now. Red one look better IMO, but it's good to have a choice.
I think that we can lave it at that now.
Here they are
I looked at discomfort levels map in Linz again, looks correct now. https://csis-dev.myclimateservice.eu/study/37/step/1643/view/maps
For historical /yearly events, it's quite colorful now.
By the way, I believe that using the north European scales in Vienna and Linz is misleading. Especially Vienna has warm continental summers.
Originally posted by @p-a-s-c-a-l in https://github.com/clarity-h2020/data-package/issues/73#issuecomment-654088923