Wand is an extension that allows users perform actions on a region based on predefined patterns. Wand is inspired by Xiki[1] and Acme[2].
Thanks to @yasuyk Wand is available in MELPA. Installation process is now as simple as M-x package-install RET wand RET.
If you don't have MELPA setup, the following migh suffice:
(add-to-list 'package-archives '("melpa" . "http://melpa.milkbox.net/packages/"))
(package-initialize)
(package-install 'wand)
(require 'wand)If you use Emacs 26+, it's recommend to use Wand with use-package:
(use-package wand
:ensure t
:config (...))Wand works by going through a list of rules, stored in the wand:*rules* variable (which should be customized to be useful). Each rule has the meaning of "if satisfied, perform an action; otherwise pass to the next rule" and is a cons of (rule-check-fn . action-fn):
rule-check-fn is a one-argument function, taking a string and returns t or nil, determining if the string satisfies the current rule
action-fn is also a one-argument function, taking the same string and performing action(s).
After setting the rules, we simply call wand:execute with the corresponding string.
Manually creating all the rules from ground up is possible but usually tedious. Hence, Wand provides the wand:create-rule helper to facilitate the creation of a rule. wand:create-rule takes several arguments describing the process of matching and extracting a string and the action performed upon. Essentially, wand:create-rule cares about the following questions:
What is the regexp that the string is checked against to determine if the rule is satisfied? (The match argument)
If the string satisfies the rule, how is it then passed to the action function? (The capture argument, options are: :after - extracting the string after the match, :whole - pass the whole string, nil - pass nil, or an extractor function taking the string and returning the processed string)
What is the action that the extracted/processed string is performed upon? (The action argument)
Is the current comment stripped before processing the string? (The skip-comment argument). Comments are stripped by default.
Here is an example of how it would look like in practice:
(setq wand:*rules*
(list (wand:create-rule :match "\\$ "
:capture :after
:action #'popup-shell-command)
(wand:create-rule :match "https?://"
:capture :whole
:action #'open-url-in-firefox)
(wand:create-rule :match "file:"
:capture :after
:action #'find-file)
(wand:create-rule :match "#> "
:capture :after
:action #'(lambda (string)
(eval (read string))))))When calling wand:execute <a-string>, the following would happen:
If the string is ;; $ ls, call (popup-shell-command "ls")
If the string is http://google.com or https://google.com, call (open-url-in-firefox <the-url>).
If the string is file:~/tmp/tmp.el, call (find-file "~/tmp/tmp/.el").
If the string is #> (message-box "¡Hola a todos!"), eval (message-box "¡Hola a todos!").
With any other string, the string is eval-ed with wand:eval-string. This the default action for all unmatched strings.
The string could span through multiple lines. If skip-comment is t, comments are stripped from all the lines.
It's recommended to bind wand:execute to a key stroke and/or mouse for quick command execution.
(global-set-key (kbd "<C-return>") 'wand:execute)
(global-set-key (kbd "<C-mouse-1>") 'wand:execute)
(global-set-key (kbd "<C-down-mouse-1>") nil)Special thanks to:
@yasuyk for making Wand available in Melpa.
@MatthewDarling for correcting code example in README.
@syl20bnr for the issue report.
This project along with its source code and all materials are released under the terms of the GNU General Public License 3.0 (GPLv3). See COPYING for more details.
Copyright (C) 2014-2019 Ha-Duong Nguyen