Closed gladky closed 6 years ago
Some of the rules here we could verify with simple LM:
As this may change frequently we could implement it in following fashion:
This way we don't have to redeploy DAQExpert but we'll send the request to defined endpoint to signal that new configuration can be picked up
I would tend to NOT put these rules in the DAQExpert for the time being.
On 04 May 2018, at 15:17, Maciej Gladki notifications@github.com wrote:
Some of the rules here we could verify with simple LM:
• LM will fire only during global runs or we check if the subsystem is masked or not • define FED ids that we expect to be IN • define FED ids that we expect to be OUT • inform when we configuration doesn't comply with expectations As this may change frequently we could implement it in following fashion:
• define list of fed ids that are expected to be OUT and IN in properties file • introduce API in expert that will pick new properties file on request This way we don't have to redeploy DAQExpert but we'll send the request to defined endpoint to signal that new configuration can be picked up
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Ok sure, it will stay as is. Just for reference, what's the reason behind this?
The rules are already checked by the Level-0.
The FEDs in&out section may change at any time on request of sub-systems.
Closing as it will stay in special instructions as is and won't be implemented in expert.
from section FEDs to be included / excluded
from section Short term special instructions [ up-to-date as of April 17 ]