Addresses #208 , although upon further inspection the error doesn't seem to be scaling. At least here we can be confident we're predicting the same during training and inference. Visual inspection confirms dag_pred_np and dag_pred perform equivallently.
Addresses #208 , although upon further inspection the error doesn't seem to be scaling. At least here we can be confident we're predicting the same during training and inference. Visual inspection confirms dag_pred_np and dag_pred perform equivallently.